000 | 03185nab a22003857a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c9238 _d9238 |
||
005 | 20250625151729.0 | ||
008 | 2513s2025 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aWeekes, Cassidy J. _913970 |
||
245 |
_aCyberstalking perpetrators and their methods : _cCassidy J. Weekes, Jennifer E. Storey and Afroditi Pina _ba systematic literature review |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2025 |
||
500 | _aTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2025, First published online, 24 April 2025 | ||
520 | _aThe existing body of research on cyberstalking has identified the prevalent nature of this behavior, and the detrimental impact that cyberstalking has on victims and society. This systematic review aims to summarize literature on the perpetration of cyberstalking with two research questions: (a) Who are the perpetrators of cyberstalking? and (b) What are the methods of cyberstalking? Two literature databases (SCOPUS and Web of Science) were searched for empirical research or literature reviews examining cyberstalking perpetration and/or methods. Following screening, 80 articles were identified and rated as highly relevant based on their applicability to the research questions. Perpetrators of cyberstalking were found to lack social skills, have low self-control, have experienced physical abuse victimization, endorsed stalking-related attitudes, and have higher rates of Internet use. Perpetrators were motivated by trying to reconcile a relationship, exact revenge, seek a relationship, or establish control over the victim. The most commonly reported methods of cyberstalking were unwanted and repeated online contact through email, social media, or text message. Other methods of cyberstalking include accessing the victim’s accounts, tracking their GPS location, posing as the victim online, or contacting friends/family of the victim. The findings of this review highlight precursors to, and patterns of, cyberstalking perpetration, and future research is required to explore how existing “offline” stalking risk assessments and typologies can be applied to cases of cyberstalking, which would allow authorities to develop effective case management strategies. (Authors' abstract). Record #9238 | ||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aAROTAKENGA MĀTĀKŌRERO _913587 |
||
650 |
_aHANGARAU MŌHIOHIO _98779 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aONLINE HARASSMENT _95989 |
||
650 |
_aPAE PĀPĀHO PĀPORI _96079 |
||
650 |
_aPERPETRATORS _92644 |
||
650 |
_aSOCIAL MEDIA _93663 |
||
650 |
_aSTALKING _93265 |
||
650 |
_aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS _93140 |
||
650 |
_aTANGATA HARA _96912 |
||
650 |
_aTECHNOLOGY-FACILITATED ABUSE _99831 |
||
650 |
_aTŪKINOTANGA Ā-WHĀNAU _95382 |
||
651 |
_aINTERNATIONAL _93624 |
||
651 |
_aUNITED KINGDOM _92604 |
||
700 |
_aStorey, Jennifer E. _913044 |
||
710 |
_aPina, Afroditi _913971 |
||
773 | 0 | _tTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2025, First published online, 24 April 2025 | |
830 |
_aTrauma, Violence & Abuse _94623 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251333411 _zdoi: 10.1177/15248380251333411 (Open access) |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews134 |