000			03490nab a22004457a 4500
005			20250625151728.0
008			250414s2025 ||||| |||| ||| | eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aKella, Krystel A. _913897
245			_aEnhancing safety for separating families affected by domestic and family violence : _ba scoping review of modifiable factors _cKrystel A. Krella, Felicity L. Painter, Anna T. Booth, Amy Holtzworth-Munroe, Elizabeth Evans, Heng Jiang and Jennifer E. McIntosh
260			_bSage, _c2025
500			_aTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2025, First published online, 20 March 2025
520			_aRelationship separation constitutes a period of significant risk for families, with many parents and children experiencing an escalation in domestic and family violence (DFV) as they move through the separation process. While research demonstrating associated risks and adverse impacts is well documented, modifiable factors associated with increased safety for this vulnerable group have received less attention. This scoping review addresses this gap. Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR), articles were retrieved from the Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and SCOPUS databases. Results were limited to peer-reviewed articles reporting original empirical data, in English. No date restrictions were applied. In the resulting 17 eligible studies, we found inconsistent definition and measurement of safety underscored by a paucity of research focusing on safety as a primary outcome for separating families affected by DFV. Of the available evidence, socioecological factors associated with enhanced safety during this period included physical distance from the perpetrator, strategic use of technology to enhance safety, relational support, survivor-centered service support, and intentional processes to aide safety within the family law and court systems. At the individual level, parents’ active role in navigating safety for themselves and their children, particularly in the face of systemic and service barriers, appears key. Consideration is given to the interface of systems, socioecological and individual factors that may collectively promote safety from DFV during the family separation process. (Authors' abstract). Record #9207
650			_aAKOTAKENGA MĀTĀKŌRERO _913898
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aFAMILY LAW _9244
650			_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252
650			_aHAUMARUTANGA _95539
650			_aINTERVENTION _9326
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aLITERATURE REVIEWS _9350
650			_aPROTECTIVE FACTORS _94270
650			_aSAFETY _9511
650			_aSEPARATION _9522
650			_aSUPPORT SERVICES _9591
650			_aTURE WHĀNAU _95982
650			_aTŪKINOTANGA Ā-WHĀNAU _95382
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651			_aAUSTRALIA _92597
700			_aPainter, Felicity L. _913899
700			_aBooth, Anna T. _913900
700			_aHoltzworth-Munroe, Amy _91374
700			_aEvans, Elizabeth _913901
700			_aJiang, Heng _94674
700			_aMcIntosh, Jennifer E. _910286
773	0		_tTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2025, First published online, 20 March 2025
830			_aTrauma, Violence & Abuse _94623
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251325195 _zdoi: 10.1177/15248380251325195 (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews133
999			_c9207 _d9207