000 | 01656nab a22003257a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c8966 _d8966 |
||
005 | 20250625151714.0 | ||
008 | 240919s2018 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aWinter, Stephen _913452 |
||
245 |
_aRedressing historic abuse in New Zealand : _ba comparative critique _cStephen Winter |
||
260 |
_bTaylor & Francis, _c2018 |
||
500 | _aPolitical Science, 70(1): 1–25 | ||
520 | _aThis paper provides a comparative institutionalist critique of New Zealand’s monetary redress process for survivors of abuse in care. Using an Irish comparator, the paper advances an institutionalist critique that focusses on how programme operations affect survivors’ interests. The paper first describes the historic claims processes in New Zealand and Ireland and then assesses monetary redress practice against four characteristic survivor interests: cost, transparency, support and justice. (Author's abstract). Record #8966 | ||
650 | 4 |
_9152 _aCOMPENSATION |
|
650 | 0 |
_98154 _aCOMPLAINTS PROCEDURES |
|
650 | 0 |
_98307 _aHistoric Claims Resolution Process |
|
650 | 0 |
_98209 _aINSTITUTIONAL ABUSE |
|
650 | 0 |
_aINSTITUTIONAL CARE _9315 |
|
650 | 0 |
_93394 _aINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON |
|
650 | 0 |
_aJUSTICE _9333 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aVICTIMS _9622 |
|
650 | 0 |
_910668 _aVICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE |
|
651 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
||
651 |
_aINTERNATIONAL _93624 |
||
651 |
_aIRELAND _93457 |
||
773 | 0 | _tPolitical Science, 70(1): 1–25 | |
830 |
_aPolitical Science _95755 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2018.1483204 _zDOI: 10.1080/00323187.2018.1483204 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _inews130 |