000 01656nab a22003257a 4500
999 _c8966
_d8966
005 20250625151714.0
008 240919s2018 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aWinter, Stephen
_913452
245 _aRedressing historic abuse in New Zealand :
_ba comparative critique
_cStephen Winter
260 _bTaylor & Francis,
_c2018
500 _aPolitical Science, 70(1): 1–25
520 _aThis paper provides a comparative institutionalist critique of New Zealand’s monetary redress process for survivors of abuse in care. Using an Irish comparator, the paper advances an institutionalist critique that focusses on how programme operations affect survivors’ interests. The paper first describes the historic claims processes in New Zealand and Ireland and then assesses monetary redress practice against four characteristic survivor interests: cost, transparency, support and justice. (Author's abstract). Record #8966
650 4 _9152
_aCOMPENSATION
650 0 _98154
_aCOMPLAINTS PROCEDURES
650 0 _98307
_aHistoric Claims Resolution Process
650 0 _98209
_aINSTITUTIONAL ABUSE
650 0 _aINSTITUTIONAL CARE
_9315
650 0 _93394
_aINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
650 0 _aJUSTICE
_9333
650 0 _aVICTIMS
_9622
650 0 _910668
_aVICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE
651 _aNEW ZEALAND
_92588
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
651 _aIRELAND
_93457
773 0 _tPolitical Science, 70(1): 1–25
830 _aPolitical Science
_95755
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2018.1483204
_zDOI: 10.1080/00323187.2018.1483204
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE
_inews130