000 02935nab a22002657a 4500
999 _c8852
_d8852
005 20250625151708.0
008 240805s2024 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aTrood, Michael D.
_913253
245 _aThe limits of predicting near lethal and lethal family and intimate partner violence
_cMichael D. Trood, Benjamin L. Spivak, James R. P. Ogloff, and Troy E. McEwan
260 _bCRIMRXIV,
_c2024
520 _aAccurate assessment of the risk of fatal family or intimate partner violence (FIPV), particularly of intimate partner homicide (IPH), has long been a clinical and research goal.  Although several risk assessments have been developed to assist in this task, limited validation methodologies in past research mean that it remains unclear whether fatal FIPV can be accurately predicted. This study aimed to address this research gap using a prospective methodology. Prediction of lethal and near lethal FIPV was tested in a full population cohort (n = 38,454) of unique perpetrator and victim dyads recorded by police over 7 months between September 2019 and March 2020 in the Australian state of Victoria. The predictive validity of an actuarial risk assessment instrument (ARAI) previously validated for general FIPV risk and of 12 widely recognized risk factors for male-to-female IPH were assessed over a 12-month follow-up period. Neither the ARAI, individual IPH risk factors, nor a model developed from the IPH risk factors, accurately predicted which dyads subsequently came to police attention for lethal or near lethal FIPV. All methods misclassified many thousands of dyads as high risk who did not have subsequently reported lethal/near lethal FIPV. These findings were attributable to both the low base rate of lethal/near lethal FIPV during the follow-up period (a universal phenomenon), and the commonality of widely recognized risk markers for male-to-female IPH in FIPV cases reported to police. These results indicate that when evaluated using a prospective design, existing assessments of FIPV homicide risk are likely to overestimate the risk of homicide in a very substantial number of cases. This suggests that a public health approach to the prevention of FIPV homicide may be of greater utility than trying to accurately identify cases at high risk of a low base rate event such as homicide. (Authors abstract). Record #8852
650 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 _aFAMILY VIOLENCE
_9252
650 _aHOMICIDE
_9297
650 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 _aRISK ASSESSMENT
_9504
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
651 _aUNITED KINGDOM
_92604
700 _aSpivak, Benjamin L.
_913254
700 _94355
_aOgloff, James R.P.
700 _aMcEwan, Troy E.
_913255
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.253db452
_zDOI: 10.21428/cb6ab371.253db452 (Open access)
942 _2ddc
_cBRIEFING
_hnews129