000 | 02920nab a22003497a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c8778 _d8778 |
||
005 | 20250625151705.0 | ||
008 | 240716s2023 -n|| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aBurgstedt, Corinna _913156 |
||
245 |
_aDoes gender affect judges’ perceptions of sexual assault cases? _cCorinna Burgstedt, Amy Beeby, Harlene Hayne, Linda Hobbs, Julien Gross and Tess Patterson |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2023 |
||
500 | _aJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2024, 38(1-2), 466-508. | ||
520 | _aThere is growing recognition that females engage in harmful sexual behaviour that is similar in severity and type to males. Existing research, however, suggests that there is a bias towards leniency in judicial systems for female sexual offenders (FSOs) in comparison to male sexual offenders (MSOs). Specifically, FSOs receive shorter sentences than do MSOs and are less likely to be sentenced to prison. The majority of research examining disparity in sentence outcomes for FSOs have been analysed through a quantitative lens. Qualitative methodology is also needed to understand any subjective differences in the way that judges perceive case-relevant factors and whether these perceptions differ as a function of the offender’s gender. The present study is a qualitative study that examined judges’ perceptions and descriptions of FSO compared to MSO in 10 matched cases of sexual offending. The study found that although there were many similarities in how judges perceived FSO compared to MSO, there were also unique differences that could explain more lenient sentences for FSOs (i.e. the vulnerability, poor mental health and adverse backgrounds of FSOs). Other unique differences found were that judges’ perception of FSOs behaviour was described as depraved and cruel, whereas MSOs similar behaviour was not described in such an emotive way. The present study provides additional insight into the reasons for a bias towards leniency for FSOs. In particular, it points towards judicial focus on particular personal circumstances that are seen as relevant in sentencing FSOs but not for MSOs. (Authors' abstract). Record #8778 | ||
650 |
_aABUSIVE WOMEN _927 |
||
650 |
_aCRIMINAL JUSTICE _9167 |
||
650 | 4 |
_9269 _aGENDER |
|
650 | 0 |
_98151 _aLEGAL PROFESSION |
|
650 |
_aSENTENCING _94166 |
||
650 |
_aSEX OFFENDERS _9528 |
||
650 |
_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531 |
||
650 |
_aWOMEN _9645 |
||
651 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
||
700 |
_aBeeby, Amy _910518 |
||
700 |
_aHayne, Harlene _91320 |
||
700 |
_aHobbs, Linda _910519 |
||
700 |
_aGross, Julien _910520 |
||
700 |
_aPatterson, Tess _96597 |
||
773 | 0 | _tJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2024, 38(1-2), 466-508. | |
830 |
_aJournal of Interpersonal Violence _94621 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221085034 _zDOI: 10.1177/08862605221085034 (Open access) |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews128 |