000			03250nab a22003377a 4500
999			_c8536 _d8536
005			20250625151654.0
008			240207s2024 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aLim, Gene _912618
245			_aOn the structural conditions shaping implementation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ)-inclusive practices within intimate partner services in Australia _cGene Lim, Stephanie Lusby, Marina Carman and Adam Borne
260			_bSpringer, _c2024
500			_aJournal of Family Violence, 2024, First published 2 February 2024
520			_aPurpose IPV constitutes a serious health concern for LGBTQ populations within Australia, yet inclusive service provision remains sparsely and unevenly accessible to victim-survivors. While poor availability and accessibility of inclusive services is widely recognized as an issue facing LGBTQ victim-survivors, few researchers have examined the structural or systemic basis of this problem. The current piece seeks to explore the structural conditions obstructing inclusive service provision to LGBTQ victim-survivors, from the perspective of service providers. Method N = 19 interviews were conducted with N = 21 key personnel with affiliations to a variety of: (i) general population service organizations, (ii) community-led service organizations and (ii) advisory or convening groups. Interviews explored the structural conditions of the IPV service sector, focusing on barriers and enablers to implementing inclusive service provision for LGBTQ populations. Results Three broad factors that obstructed or curtailed inclusive service implementation were identified. These were namely: (i) resistance from both internal and external sources around inclusive practice, (ii) accommodating keeping demands in resource constrained contexts, and (ii) political will and LGBTQ visibility within official policy. Responses to these challenges on the organizational level were sometimes sufficient to meaningfully – though only partially – ameliorate these factors, but seldom addressed the structural conditions that necessitate such responses. Conclusion Inclusive service provision is a crucial element of victim-survivor recovery. The sporadic accessibility of such services within Australia can be attributed to several core features of sector and policy landscapes, which demand a significant degree of inter-organizational collaboration and collective advocacy to overcome. (Authors' abstract). Record #8536
650			_aBISEXUAL _93319
650			_aGAY _9268
650			_aINTERVENTION _9326
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aLESBIAN _9348
650		0	_aLGBTQIA+ _93453
650		4	_aSUPPORT SERVICES _9591
650			_aTRANSGENDER _93315
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
700			_aLusby, Stephanie _912619
700			_aCarman, Marina _99265
700			_aBorne, Adam _912620
773	0		_tJournal of Family Violence, 2024, First published 2 February 2024
830			_aJournal of Family Violence _94619
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00629-0 _zDOI: 10.1007/s10896-023-00629-0 (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews125