000			01943nab a22003017a 4500
999			_c8425 _d8425
005			20250625151649.0
008			231127s2023 || |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aJones, Balawyn _912396
245			_aCALD communities as “collateral damage” in the criminalization of coercive control : _ban argument for prioritizing civil system reform over further criminalization in Victoria _cBalawyn Jones and Akuch Kuol Anyieth
260			_bSage, _c2023
500			_aViolence Against Women, First published online, 17 November 2023
520			_aWhen posing the question of whether Victoria should follow other Australian states in criminalizing coercive control as a form of domestic and family violence (DFV), there are many arguments in favor of and against in the literature. However, scholars and advocates from marginalized communities, or in allyship with marginalized communities, tend to be cautious of embracing further criminalization, particularly due to the risks such an approach poses for women from culturally and linguistically diverse communities. This paper argues that women from marginalized communities are treated as “collateral damage” in the campaign to eliminate DFV via criminal law interventions. (Authors' abstract). Record #8425
650			_aCOERCIVE CONTROL _95771
650			_aCRIMINAL LAW _9169
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aETHNIC COMMUNITIES _98712
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aJUSTICE _9333
650			_aMIGRANTS _9385
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
700			_aAnyieth, Akuck K. _912397
773	0		_tViolence Against Women, First published online, 17 November 2023
830			_aViolence Against Women _94609
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231214775 _zDOI: https: 10.1177/10778012231214775 (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews124