000 03687nam a22004697a 4500
999 _c8414
_d8414
005 20250625151648.0
008 231120s2021 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aTyler, Nichola
_912362
245 _aThe New Zealand Fire Awareness and Intervention Programme :
_cNichola Tyler, Clare-Ann Fortune, Louise Dixon and Tia Neha
_breach, uptake and barriers to engagement
260 _bFire and Emergency New Zealand,
_c2021
300 _aelectronic document (76 pages) ; PDF file
500 _aFire and Emergency New Zealand research report, no. 180, May 2021
520 _aObjectives. The current research aimed to examine (1) the characteristics of rangatahi identified as having set fires in Aotearoa New Zealand, (2) the reach and uptake of the Fire Awareness and Intervention Programme (FAIP) and, (3) factors which act as facilitators and barriers to engagement with the FAIP. Method and Analysis. A mixed-methods approach was used to meet the objectives of the research. To identify the characteristics of rangatahi identified as having set fires and the reach of the FAIP, quantitative analyses were conducted on data routinely collected by Fire and Emergency New Zealand from the Fire Incident Reporting Management System (FIRMS) and the Fire Awareness and Intervention Programme (FAIP) database, for the period 1st July 2009 to 30th June 2019. Descriptive statistics were computed to describe the characteristics of rangatahi involved fire incidents and the characteristics of those referred to the FAIP. Comparisons between unintentional and deliberate fire incidents were made using chi-square. To examine facilitators and barriers to engagement with the FAIP, individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with 16 professionals who work with rangatahi who had played with or set fires and 26 FAIP practitioners. In addition, an online qualitative survey was completed by 25 whānau whose rangatahi had been referred to the FAIP. Interviews and focus groups were conducted by telephone or audio-visual link (e.g., Zoom or Microsoft Teams) and were transcribed verbatim. The online qualitative survey was developed using the survey platform Qualtrics and distributed via community adverts online (e.g., national Facebook advertising) and on community pinboards (e.g., hard copy posters). Qualitative data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). (From the Executive summary). Record #8414
610 _aNew Zealand Fire Service.
_93523
650 2 7 _aADOLESCENTS
_943
650 0 _aADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES
_94089
650 5 _aBEHAVIOUR MODIFICATION
_979
650 5 _aCHILD EXPOSURE TO VIOLENCE
_9130
650 2 7 _aCHILDREN
_9127
650 2 7 _aCRIME PREVENTION
_9164
650 2 7 _aFAMILY VIOLENCE
_9252
650 2 7 _aINTERVENTION
_9326
650 2 7 _aMĀORI
_9357
650 2 7 _aPACIFIC PEOPLES
_93408
650 2 7 _aPASIFIKA
_9419
650 2 7 _aSEPARATION
_9522
650 2 7 _aRISK FACTORS
_9505
650 2 4 _aTAIOHI
_9595
650 2 4 _aTAITAMARIKI
_9596
650 2 7 _aYOUNG MEN
_9658
650 2 7 _aYOUNG PEOPLE
_9660
650 2 4 _aYOUNG OFFENDERS
_9659
651 4 _aNEW ZEALAND
_92588
700 _aFortune, Clare-Ann
_912363
700 _aDixon, Louise
_99183
700 _aNeha, Tia
_912364
773 0 3 _tFire and Emergency New Zealand research report, no. 180, May 2021
830 _aFire and Emergency New Zealand research report, no. 180, May 2021
_912365
856 _uhttps://www.fireandemergency.nz/assets/Documents/Research-and-reports/Report-180_FAIP-Reach-Uptake-and-Barriers-to-Engagement-2021.pdf
_zDownload report, PDF
942 _2ddc
_cREPORT
_hnews124