000			02143nab a22002417a 4500
999			_c8412 _d8412
005			20250625151648.0
008			221120s2021 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aDixon, Louise _99183
245			_aClassification of intimate partner aggression _cLouise Dixon and Annabelle Wride
260			_bElsevier, _c2021
500			_aAggression and Violent Behavior, 2021, 59, 101437
520			_aThe heterogeneity of people who aggress against an intimate partner is well established, and classification systems have long been produced to describe core differences between these people. However, typologies have failed to inform treatment and sophisticated theoretical explanations about the causes of intimate partner aggression (IPA). Recent theoretical research suggests that classification systems can be meaningful in informing explanations and treatment of offending behavior if they are derived from units of classification that are well suited to the task of explanation. This paper critiques a commonly used typology that aims to inform the explanation of IPA, the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) typology. Measured against recent theoretical developments, the classification system is found to be lacking in its ability to effectively inform explanation and treatment. The value of deriving a classification system based on the goals of human functioning to inform an inclusive approach to the explanation and treatment of IPA is thus considered. The implications of rethinking the way classification systems of intimate partner abuse are developed for prevention of this public health issue is also contemplated. (Authors' abstract). Record #8412
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aPERPETRATORS _92644
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700			_aWride, Annabelle _912361
773	0		_tAggression and Violent Behavior, 2021, 59, 101437
830			_aAggression and Violent Behavior _94827
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101437 _zDOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2020.101437
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews124