000 | 03585nab a22003257a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c8394 _d8394 |
||
005 | 20250625151647.0 | ||
008 | 231102s2023 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aKaul, Anjuli _912346 |
||
245 |
_aImproving emotional safety, coping and resilience among women conducting research on sexual and domestic violence and abuse _cAnjuli Kaul, Danai Daphine Chavendera, Katherine Saunders and Sharli Anne Paphitis |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2023 |
||
500 | _aJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2023, First published online, 24 October 2023 | ||
520 | _aSecondary trauma arises through indirect exposure to trauma through engaging with first-hand accounts and narratives of traumatic events. While a significant amount of research has explored secondary trauma experienced by professionals who work with survivors of trauma, such as clinicians and front-line service providers, there is little research exploring the experiences of secondary trauma among violence researchers who routinely engage with traumatic first-hand accounts through their work. This study qualitatively explored violence researcher’s professional experiences of secondary trauma and their perceptions of what enables and constrains their own coping and resilience. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with seven female violence researchers from the United Kingdom. Questions explored participant’s experiences of secondary trauma symptoms related to their research, perceptions of their own coping and resilience, and experiences of organizational support that have enabled or constrained their resilience. Data were analyzed thematically using a coding framework applied reflexively across interview transcripts. All participants reported experiencing symptoms of secondary trauma from their work including cognitive disturbances; altered beliefs of themselves, others or the world; and challenges connecting with others. Participants’ assessment of their own expertise in violence research did not generally impact their perception of their own resilience. Organizational support for violence researchers was rarely provided and participants felt generally unsupported—left to manage any resultant distress alone. Research organizations and universities should implement trauma-informed policies which positively transform workplace culture, provide peer support spaces, and conduct effective training in order to mitigate psychological harm and promote resilience among violence researchers. Support should be tailored to the requirements of violence researchers, and institutions should develop policies that are specifically attentive to the needs of researchers who also have lived experience of violence and abuse. (Authors' abstract). Record #8394 | ||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aRESEARCH _9497 |
||
650 | 4 |
_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aTRAUMA _9612 |
|
650 |
_aWOMEN _9645 |
||
650 |
_aWORKPLACE _9652 |
||
651 |
_aINTERNATIONAL _93624 |
||
651 | 4 |
_aUNITED KINGDOM _92604 |
|
700 |
_aChavendera, Danai D. _912347 |
||
700 |
_asaunders, Katherine _912348 |
||
700 |
_aPaphitis, Sharli A. _912349 |
||
773 | 0 | _tJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2023, First published online, 24 October 2023 | |
830 |
_aJournal of Interpersonal Violence _94621 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231207617 _zDOI: 10.1177/08862605231207617 (Open access) |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews123 |