000			02111nab a22002417a 4500
999			_c8357 _d8357
005			20250625151646.0
008			231004s2023 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aSimon-Kumar, Rachel _95754
245			_aAffirming fissures : _bconceptualizing intersectional ‘ethnic’ feminism in Aotearoa New Zealand _cRachel Simon-Kumar
260			_bTaylor & Francis, _c2023
500			_aJournal of Women, Politics and Policy, First published online, 4 September 2023
520			_aIntersectionality, as scholarship and praxis, has traversed boundaries far beyond its roots in Black American feminism into population groups whose histories of marginalization are vastly different to those envisioned by Kimberlé Crenshaw. In translation, intersectionality can articulate with new clarity the voices of the invisibilized but also reveal fundamental fissures. This article discusses these contradictions in the context of “ethnic” populations in Aotearoa New Zealand. Comprising 17% of the total population, ethnic groups are peoples who come from Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East. In this article, I set out to interrogate the viability of an Antipodean ethnic feminism given the distinct backdrop of white-settler colonialism, biculturalism, and multiculturalism extant in contemporary New Zealand. I point to five “fault lines” – around positioning, culture, minoritization, place and the subject – where conceptual clarity will deepen ethnic feminism’s theoretical roots and relevance for NZ’s fastest growing population group. (Author's abstract). Record #8357
650			_aETHNIC COMMUNITIES _98712
650			_aFEMINISM _9256
650			_aINTERSECTIONALITY _96433
650			_aMIGRANTS _9385
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
773	0		_tJournal of Women, Politics and Policy, First published online, 4 September 2023
830			_aJournal of Women, Politics and Policy _97480
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2023.2247927 _zDOI: 10.1080/1554477X.2023.2247927 (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews123