000 03722nab a22002897a 4500
999 _c8318
_d8318
005 20250625151644.0
008 230816s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aOlson, Rose M.
_912233
245 _aThe implementation and effectiveness of the one stop centre model for intimate partner and sexual violence in low- and middle-income countries :
_ba systematic review of barriers and enablers
_cRose McKeon Olson, Claudia Garcia Moreno and Manuela Colombini
260 _bBMJ,
_c2020
500 _aBMJ Global Health 2020;5: e001883.
520 _antroduction Many low- and middle-income countries have implemented health-system based one stop centres to respond to intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexual violence. Despite its growing popularity in low- and middle-income countries and among donors, no studies have systematically reviewed the one stop centre. Using a thematic synthesis approach, this systematic review aims to identify enablers and barriers to implementation of the one stop centre (OSC) model and to achieving its intended results for women survivors of violence in low- and middle-income countries. Methods We searched PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases and grey literature using a predetermined search strategy to identify all relevant qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. Overall, 42 studies were included from 24 low- and middle-income countries. We used a three-stage thematic synthesis methodology to synthesise the qualitative evidence, and we used the CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) approach to assess confidence in the qualitative research. Meta-analysis could not be performed due heterogeneity in results and outcome measures. Quantitative data are presented by individual study characteristics and outcomes, and key findings are incorporated into the qualitative thematic framework. Results The review found 15 barriers with high-confidence evidence and identified seven enablers with moderate-confidence evidence. These include barriers to implementation such as lack of multisectoral staff and private consultation space as well as barriers to achieving the intended result of multisectoral coordination due to fragmented services and unclear responsibilities of implementing partners. There were also differences between enablers and barriers of various OSC models such as the hospital-based OSC, the stand-alone OSC and the NGO-run OSC. Conclusion This review demonstrates that there are several barriers that have often prevented the OSC model from being implemented as designed and achieving the intended result of providing high quality, accessible, acceptable, multisectoral care. Existing OSCs will likely require strategic investment to address these specific barriers before they can achieve their ultimate goal of reducing survivor retraumatisation when seeking care. More rigorous and systematic evaluation of the OSC model is needed to better understand whether the OSC model of care is improving support for survivors of IPV and sexual violence. (Authors' abstract). Record #8218
650 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 _aHEALTH
_9283
650 _aINTERVENTION
_9326
650 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
650 0 _aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
_93140
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
700 _aGarcia-Moreno, Claudia
_91200
700 _aColombini, Manuela
_94450
773 0 _tBMJ Global Health 2020;5: e001883.
830 _aBMJ Global Health
_99581
856 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001883
_zDOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001883 (Open access)
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE
_hnews122