| 000 | 01991nab a22003017a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c8291 _d8291 |
||
| 005 | 20250625151643.0 | ||
| 008 | 230731s2021 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _aAFVC | ||
| 100 |
_aArmstrong, Lynzi _910013 |
||
| 245 |
_aDecriminalisation of sex work in the post-truth era? : _bstrategic storytelling in neo-abolitionist accounts of the New Zealand model _cLynzi Armstrong, |
||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2021 |
||
| 500 | _aCriminology & Criminal Justice, 2021, 21(3): 369-386 | ||
| 520 | _aIn the context of on-going debates regarding sex work laws, in most jurisdictions forms of criminalisation continue to dominate. Despite decades of sex workers calling for the decriminalisation of sex work and collectively organising against repressive laws, decriminalisation remains uncommon. New Zealand was the first full country to decriminalise sex work with the passing of the Prostitution Reform Act in 2003, which aimed to improve occupational health and safety. Several empirical studies have documented positive impacts of this framework. However, despite this, neo-abolitionists persistently describe the New Zealand model as a failed approach. This article examines neo-abolitionist knowledge claims regarding the New Zealand model and in doing so unpacks the strategic stories told about this approach, considering the implications for sex work policy making. (Author's abstract). Record #8291 | ||
| 650 |
_aATTITUDES _970 |
||
| 650 |
_aEVALUATION _9236 |
||
| 650 |
_aHEALTH _9283 |
||
| 650 |
_aLAW REFORM _9338 |
||
| 650 |
_aPROSTITUTION _9468 |
||
| 650 | 0 |
_98110 _aPROSTITUTION REFORM ACT 2003 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aSAFETY _9511 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aWOMEN _9645 |
|
| 650 |
_aWORKPLACE _9652 |
||
| 651 | 4 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
|
| 773 | 0 | _tCriminology & Criminal Justice, 2021, 21(3): 369-386 | |
| 830 |
_aCriminology & Criminal Justice _96174 |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820918898 _zDOI: 10.1177/1748895820918898 |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews121 |
||