000			03008nab a22003137a 4500
999			_c8264 _d8264
005			20250625151642.0
008			230704s2023 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aCook, Elizabeth A. _912121
245			_aParallels in practice : _bapplying principles of research integrity and ethics in domestic violence fatality review (DVFR) _cElizabeth A. Cook, James Rowlands, · Kelly Bracewell, Cassandra Jones and Grace Boughton
260			_bSpringer, _c2023
500			_aJournal of Family Violence, 2023, First published online, 18 February 2023
520			_aPurpose Within the context of the big data society, new systems of data collection on domestic violence and abuse (DVA) have emerged. One such system is Domestic Violence Fatality Review (DVFR) which captures the various dimensions of gender, violence, and abuse required to form an evidence base for prevention. However, to date, there has been limited dia- logue between practitioners and researchers about the ‘doing’ of DVFRs. Method As DVFR systems vary by jurisdiction, we conducted a case study of Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) in England and Wales. Applying the Research Integrity Framework (RIF) developed by the four Women’s Aid Federations in the United Kingdom (UK), this article examines both the practice of DHR and how it is utilised as data in research. Results Informed by our situated perspectives as researchers and/or practitioners working in the field, our analysis demon- strates how undertaking DHR as a practitioner parallels collecting, accessing, and analysing data from DHRs as a researcher. Guiding principles are identified to help practitioners and researchers navigate the parallel challenges they confront and, critically, inform dialogue between practice and research. Conclusions Implications for both professional practice and research are presented. To increase transparency and confidence, we argue that more attention should be afforded to the methodological and ethical issues inherent in both the practice of DHRs, and their utilisation as a source of data in research. While DHRs have differences to DVFRs in other jurisdictions, these findings also have implications for these other systems which will also be discussed. (Authors' abstract). Record #8264
650			_aDATA ANALYSIS _9181
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aHOMICIDE _9297
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aRESEARCH ETHICS _9498
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aUNITED KINGDOM _92604
700			_aRowlands, James _94559
700			_aBracewell, Kelly _912123
700			_aJones, Cassandra _912124
700			_aBoughton, Grace _912125
773	0		_tJournal of Family Violence, 2023, First published online, 18 February 2023
830			_aJournal of Family Violence _912126
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00505-x _yDOI: 10.1007/s10896-023-00505-x (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews121