000			02128nab a22002777a 4500
999			_c8209 _d8209
005			20250625151639.0
008			230531s2018 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_98090 _aBeres, Melanie A.
245			_aWhat does faking orgasms have to do with sexual consent? _cMelanie Beres
260			_bSage, _c2018
500			_aSexualities, 2018, 21(4): 702-705
520			_aIn recent years, sexual violence prevention has been undergoing a shift towards a consent-focused model of rape prevention. Oxford and Cambridge universities have mandated consent training for all incoming students (Weale, 2014), and California passed a law requiring all colleges to provide policies and training for students on affirmative consent (consent where it is the initiator’s responsibility to ensure consent has been granted; De Leon, 2014). Activist campaigns have also taken up the language of consent. Slogans such as ‘consent is sexy’ and ‘sex without consent is rape’ are being popularized by social media campaigns and activist efforts such as Slut Walk (see Dajee, 2014; Lam et al., 2014; Sexual Assault Voices, 2010). The recent article published by Thomas and colleagues (2017) focusing on women’s accounts of faking orgasm provides an opportunity to revisit the role of consent for sexual violence prevention and sexuality education more broadly. This is the first paragraph of the author's commentary on "Faking to finish: Women’s accounts of feigning sexual pleasure to end unwanted sex" (Thomas, Stelzl & Lafrance, 2017)).
650			_aCONSENT _94690
650		4	_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531
650		0	_aSEXUALITY EDUCATION _96891
650		0	_aVICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE _96716
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aCANADA _92602
773	0		_tSexualities, 2018, 21(4): 702-705
830			_aSexualities _911812
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717708151 _zDOI: 10.1177/1363460717708151
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716649338 _zRead abstract, Thomas e al, 2017 in Sexualities, 20(3): 281-301
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE