000 02483nab a22002897a 4500
999 _c8177
_d8177
005 20250625151638.0
008 230523s2023 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aForster, Christine
_911945
245 _aSexual misconduct by New Zealand lawyers
_cChristine Forster, Jennifer Schulz and Kate Diesfeld
260 _bNew Zealand Law Society,
_c2023
490 0 _aNew Zealand Law Journal
500 _aNew Zealand Law Journal, April 2023: 79-85
520 _aThis article analyses the disciplinary framework as it applies to sexual misconduct by New Zealand lawyers. It focuses on two connected themes. The first examines the historical development of the legal profession “by men for men” leading to a workplace culture that enables sexual misconduct. (Carroll Seron and others, “Persistence is cultural: professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation” (2016) 4(2) 'Work and Occupations' 178). Although this analysis situates sexual misconduct in the context of institutional failings, the 'Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006' (LCA) frames misconduct (including sexual misconduct) as the failings of individual practitioners. We draw on a previous analysis of lawyers’ sexual misconduct decisions from Australian cases from 2000 to 2020 which found that sexual misconduct was often framed as the character flaws of practitioners, without discussion of the wider prevalence of violence against women (Jennifer Schulz, Christine Forster and Kate Diesfeld, “The discipline of, and failure to sanction, sexual misconduct by Australian legal practitioners” (2022) 'Legal Ethics' 1). The second theme analyses the LCA’s separation of misconduct between the professional and the personal domains, shielding private sexual misconduct from professional discipline, unless so serious that the lawyer is considered not a “fit and proper person”. (Authors' abstract). Record #8177
650 _aATTITUDES
_970
650 _aCOMPLAINTS PROCEDURES
_98154
650 _aLEGAL PROFESSION
_98151
650 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
650 0 _aVIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
_93088
650 _aWORKPLACE
_9652
651 4 _aNEW ZEALAND
_92588
700 _aSchulz, Jennifer
_911946
700 _aDiesfeld, Kate
_92876
773 0 _tNew Zealand Law Journal, April 2023: 79-85
856 _uhttps://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/agispt.20230516088498
_zRead abstract
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE
_hnews120