000			03180nam a22003137a 4500
999			_c8077 _d8077
005			20250625151633.0
008			230405s2019 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aEketone, Anaru _96153
245			_aThe principles of Māori directed practice and development _cAnaru D. Eketone
246			_aA thesis submitted for the degree if Doctor of Philosophy, University of Otago
260			_c2019
300			_aelectronic document (318 pages) ; PDF file
500			_aPhD thesis, University of Otago
520			_aThis research used a Qualitative Kaupapa Māori research methodology using semi-structured interviews to identify the principles of Māori Social and Community Work practice and development and how they are implemented. The research was conducted in three phases: Phase One involved interviews with Māori people working in Māori roles in Government organisations delivering social policy outcomes. It was found that Government workers implement Māori principles in four identified ways: creating supportive environments, responding to community needs, keeping themselves linked into the Māori community and following Māori processes. Phase Two involved interviews with Māori workers employed by Māori health and social service providers. These projects looked at the distinctiveness of their sites, along with the strengths, tools, principles, values and processes that underpinned their approaches. The main difference between Government and NGO workers is that, because they are already part of the community, they don’t need to make that extra effort to engage. Phase Three involved interviews with experienced Māori Social Workers about how a particular principle, whakawhanaungatanga, was implemented and the ethical dilemmas that could arise. Experienced Māori social workers were found to use a number of guiding principles and processes to protect themselves and their clients when choosing to cross traditional social work boundaries. The boundaries crossed were usually perceived as organisational rather than ethical. The processes for using whakawhanaungatanga included the worker having a clearly identified role and recognised the importance of negotiation, supervision and accountability. The role of tikanga was stressed as was the need for a process similar to poroporoaki. Other findings of the research include a model for analysing Māori development and Māori organisations. Also a framework is suggested to avoid Kaupapa Māori deteriorating into either a culturally appropriate Critical Theory response or as Graham Smith warned, a domesticated Culturalist expression. (Author's abstract). Record #8077
650			_aCULTURE _9179
650			_aMĀORI _9357
650			_aRANGAHAU MĀORI _95532
650			_aSOCIAL WORK PRACTICE _9562
650		4	_aSOCIAL SERVICES _9555
650		4	_aSUPPORT SERVICES _9591
650			_aTHESES _9606
650			_aTOKO I TE ORA _95247
650		0	_aTIKANGA TUKU IHO _95542
650			_aTUHINGA WHAKAPAE _95598
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
856			_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/2292/57555
942			_2ddc _cTHESIS _hkmthesis23