000 | 02789nam a22003257a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c8007 _d8007 |
||
005 | 20250625151630.0 | ||
008 | 230215s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aFairhill, Kate _911616 |
||
245 |
_aThe impact of rurality on women's 'space for action' in domestic violence : _bfindings from a meta-synthesis _cKate Fairhill, Bridget Harris and Delanie Woodlock |
||
260 |
_bOhio State University, _c2020 |
||
500 | _aInternational Journal of Rural Criminology, 2020, 5(2): 181-203 | ||
520 | _aMen's violence against women is a global human rights issue, with domestic violence one of the most common forms (World Health Organization, 2017). The consequences of domestic violence include detrimental effects on victim-survivors' health, well-being, and sense of safety. To understand these impacts, the concept of 'space for action' seeks to evaluate how perpetrators of domestic violence narrow women's life choices, constraining their freedom (Kelly, 2003). In this article, we build upon the concept of 'space for action' by examining if, and how, rural geographical space and place can be used by perpetrators to constrict women's options for escape, or even shape the violence itself. In conducting a meta-synthesis of 32 global studies, we found similarities in rural women's experiences of violence. Perpetrators used both geographical space and rural social norms to constrain women's space for action. In particular, geographical and social isolation were used to hold women in literal captivity. Rural communities were often experienced as shaming and ostracizing. This provided women with few opportunities to help-seek and aided perpetrators in reducing women's spaces for safety. Women's space for action was also curtailed in the realms of finance, employment, and their ability to care for their children. These findings demonstrate that geographical place and space can be used by perpetrators to narrow and limit women's space for action. As such, rurality should be included in understanding how men's violence limits women's freedoms. (Authors' abstract). Record #8007 | ||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252 |
||
650 |
_aHEALTH _9283 |
||
650 |
_aHELP SEEKING _95453 |
||
650 |
_aINTERVENTION _9326 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aLITERATURE REVIEWS _9350 |
||
650 |
_aRURAL AREAS _9508 |
||
651 |
_aINTERNATIONAL _93624 |
||
651 | 4 |
_aAUSTRALIA _92597 |
|
700 |
_aHarris, Bridget _99862 |
||
710 |
_aWoodlock, Delanie _910868 |
||
773 | 0 | _tInternational Journal of Rural Criminology, 2020, 5(2): 181-203 | |
830 |
_aInternational Journal of Rural Criminology _94731 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://kb.osu.edu/handle/1811/92031 _yRead online |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |