000			03251nab a22004457a 4500
999			_c7970 _d7970
005			20250625151629.0
008			230120s2019 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aYon, Youngje _97675
245			_aElder abuse prevalence in institutional settings : _ba systematic review and meta-analysis _cYongje Yon, Maria Ramiro-Gonzalez Christopher R. Mikton, Manfred Huber and Dinesh Sethi
260			_bOxford Academic, _c2019
500			_aEuropean Journal of Public Health, 29(2): 58-67
520			_bBackground: A recent study has shown that close to one in six older adults have experienced elder abuse in a community setting in the past year. It is thought that abuse in institutions is just as prevalent. Few systematic evidence of the scale of the problem exists in elder care facilities. The aim of this review is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the problem in institutional settings and to provide estimates of the prevalence of elder abuse in the past 12 months. Methods: Fourteen academic databases and other online platforms were systematically searched for studies on elder abuse. Additionally, 26 experts in the field were consulted to identify further studies. All studies were screened for inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted, and meta-analysis was conducted. Self-reported data from older residents and staff were considered separately. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria from an initial of 55 studies identified for review. Overall abuse estimates, based on staff reports, suggest that 64.2% of staff admitted to elder abuse in the past year. There were insufficient studies to calculate an overall prevalence estimate based on self-reported data from older residents. Prevalence estimates for abuse subtypes reported by older residents were highest for psychological abuse (33.4%), followed by physical (14.1%), financial (13.8%), neglect (11.6%), and sexual abuse (1.9%). Conclusions: The prevalence of elder abuse in institutions is high. Global action to improve surveillance and monitoring of institutional elder abuse is vital to inform policy action to prevent elder abuse. (Authors' abstract). Record #7970
650			_aELDER ABUSE _9220
650			_aFINANCIAL ABUSE _92968
650			_aINSTITUTIONAL CARE _9315
650			_aNEGLECT _9401
650			_aOLDER PEOPLE _9414
650			_aPHYSICAL ABUSE _9439
650		4	_aPSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE _9472
650			_aPREVALENCE _9457
650		4	_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531
650		0	_aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS _93140
650		0	_aINSTITUTIONAL ABUSE _98209
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651			_aCZECH REPUBLIC _911552
651			_aGERMANY _95137
651			_aIRELAND _93457
651			_aISRAEL _93637
651			_aSLOVENIA _911553
651		4	_aUNITED STATES _92646
700			_aRamiro-Gonzalez, Maria _911554
700			_aMikton, Christopher _91713
700			_aManfred, Huber _911555
700			_aSethi, Dinesh _96365
773	0		_tEuropean Journal of Public Health, 29(2): 58-67
830			_aEuropean Journal of Public Health _97200
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky093 _zDOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky093 (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE