000			10028nab a22007937a 4500
999			_c7957 _d7957
005			20250625151628.0
008			221208s2022 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_2 2537-9666 (Online)
040			_aAFVC
100			_aQuince, Khylee _98428
245			_aPapers from AUT Law School and NZWLJ Symposium “Law and gender: Beyond patriarchy” : _cincludes articles by Khylee Quince, Annick Masselot, Phoebe Moir, Freya McKechnie, Emma Phelps, Nadia Murray-Ragg, Alice Mander and Reina Vaii. Editorial: Ella Maiden and Kat Werry. Foreword; Cassandra Mudgway and Lida Ayoubi _bspecial edition of NZWLJ
260			_bLexis Nexis, _c2022
300			_aelectronic document (133 pages) ; PDF file
500			_aNew Zealand Women's Law Journal - Te Aho Kawe Kaupapa Ture a ngā Wāhine, 2022, Volume VI
505			_tSistahs in arms? Mana wāhine and feminism / Khylee Quince. Keynote speech, (pages 9-23)
505			_tFeminist perspective on natural disasters responses: lessons from the Canterbury earthquakes / Annick Masselot. Abstract: What do earthquakes have to do with gender? Quite a lot. Based on the experience of the Canterbury earthquakes, this article argues that disaster emergency management and responses must necessarily be underpinned by considerations of gender equality. Earthquakes take place in the context of structural inequalities. The gender impact of natural disasters leads to unequal gender outcomes which, in turn, are further amplified by disaster emergency responses. Fundamental values, such as gender equality, are typically compromised during disaster emergency management and recovery. Gender equality is frequently dismissed as a luxury for times of plenty, while efficiency and cost are often raised as objections to including gender considerations into emergency responses. This article argues that gender-based decisions contribute to strengthened emergency response outcomes. More importantly, humanity’s very way of life, and potentially existence, depends fundamentally on the ability to make gender-based decisions at all times, including in times of natural disaster emergencies. (pages 24-42)
505			_tTransforming women-only spaces: law, policies and realities of trans inclusion in women-only safe houses in Aotearoa New Zealand / Phoebe Moir. Abstract: Women-only spaces such as safe houses (or women’s shelters) have always been places of safety and freedom for women to come together and empower each other without the influence of men. Recently, there has been a movement to exclude trans women from such spaces. While safe houses in Aotearoa New Zealand are generally inclusive of trans women, there are further practical measures which can be implemented to better support this inclusion. This paper begins by discussing the law in Aotearoa New Zealand relating to trans rights and comparing this to the law in the United Kingdom, then analyses arguments against trans inclusion and explains why they do not stand under scrutiny. This paper then analyses how to support inclusive policies with practical measures, and how inclusive policies have generally been applied in Aotearoa New Zealand. This paper concludes that inclusive policies benefit everyone, including vulnerable minorities such as trans women. Trans survivors of IPV should know with certainty, the same as every other survivor, that there are services available to support them should they need it. Trans women are a marginalised and vulnerable group, whose interests have been absent from public consideration for far too long. The analysis in this article reveals that it is time for us to question how we can better serve trans women, because we can do better. All we need to do is open our minds to the fact that our current system is not perfect. (pages 43-69)
505			_tRecognising and understanding financial abuse: addressing how agreements under s 21 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 can act as a mechanism for financial abuse / Freya McKechnie and Emma Phelps. Abstract: Intimate partner violence is sadly prevalent in New Zealand and can come in many different forms. Often the focus of academia and policy is on the physical, sexual and psychological forms of intimate partner violence. However, there are also other, less-recognised, forms of intimate partner violence, including financial abuse. This article focuses on how relationship property laws that enable people to contract out of default rules for property sharing may be used to perpetrate financial abuse. It then discusses the legal framework and considers the potential for change in this area. (pages 70-93)
505			_tSpeaking ill of the dead when “erotic asphyxiation goes wrong”: New Zealand’s need for a consistent approach to sexual history evidence in fatal and non-fatal sexual cases / Nadia Murray-Ragg. Abstract: Sexual history evidence with respect to deceased victims of sexualised killings is admissible in New Zealand. Arguing the death occurred during consensual “erotic asphyxiation gone wrong” is a popular defence strategy which emphasises the deceased’s sexual history. Section 7 of the Evidence Act 2006 provides that evidence is only admissible when, in logical terms, it tends to prove or disprove a material issue. However, it is logical that a woman can have previously consented to erotic asphyxiation, and not have consented to erotic asphyxiation in a later sexual experience. There are good reasons to doubt whether consensual sexual history is ever relevant, both when the victim is deceased, and when the complainant is living. This article analyses why having different rules for the admissibility of sexual history evidence in fatal and non-fatal sexual cases is harmful, using Grace Millane’s case as an example. Drawing on submissions made in the Peter Ellis appeal, this article argues for a consistent approach to the admissibility of sexual history evidence whether the victim is deceased, or the complainant is living. This article suggests that the current evidence admissibility rules can exclude sexual history evidence if applied consistently with the modern definition of consent. However, influenced by gendered stereotypes and rape myths, courts are finding that the deceased’s sexual history evidence is relevant. This precedent is unlikely to be expeditiously changed. Therefore, this article recommends that Parliament amend the Evidence Act to exclude sexual history evidence with respect to deceased victims of femicide. (pages 94-120)
505			_tTuakana-teina whakawhiti kōrero – A reflection on the legal profession / Alice Mander and Reina Vaii. Abstract: This tuakana-teina discussion was born out of the “Law and Gender: Beyond Patriarchy” Symposium, where both Alice and Reina spoke about their experiences in the legal profession. Reina is a Samoan lawyer and journalist from South Auckland. Alice is a Law and Arts student, and a passionate advocate for the disabled community. She currently serves as Co-President of the National Disabled Students’ Association. In this kōrero, Alice and Reina discuss three topics that have shaped their experiences in the legal world: belonging, tokenism and being the exceptional anomaly. (pages 121-133)
520			_aThis edition of the Journal was born out of this journey beyond just the publishing world. In February 2022, the Journal collaborated with the Auckland University of Technology Law School Te Wānanga Aronui o Tāmaki Makau Rau to hold a Symposium titled “Law and Gender: Beyond Patriarchy”. As discussed by Dr Cassandra Mudgway and Dr Lida Ayoubi in the Foreword, the Symposium sought to focus, specifically, on the many different gender and feminist issues in the law. We wanted to ensure the speakers were diverse and we looked to create a space where people felt safe to present their research and engage in discussion about gender, intersectionality and feminism. (From the Editorial). Abstracts for each paper are provided above. Record #7957
650			_aACCESSIBILITY _910094
650			_aCONSENT _94690
650			_aDISABLED PEOPLE _9196
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aEVIDENCE _9237
650			_aFEMINISM _9256
650			_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252
650			_aFEMICIDE _98292
650			_aFINANCIAL ABUSE _92968
650			_aGENDER EQUALITY _96853
650			_aHOMICIDE _9297
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aLAW _9336
650		0	_aLGBTQIA+ _93453
650			_aMANA WAHINE _97651
650			_aMĀORI _9357
650			_aNATURAL DISASTERS _9400
650			_aPACIFIC PEOPLES _93408
650			_aPASIFIKA _9419
650		4	_aSAMOAN PEOPLE _92975
650			_aPATRIARCHY _911129
650		0	_96314 _aPROPERTY (RELATIONSHIPS) ACT 1976
650			_aPŪNAHA TURE TAIHARA _95580
650			_aSAFETY _9511
650		4	_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531
650			_aTRANSGENDER _93315
650		0	_95382 _aTŪKINOTANGA Ā-WHĀNAU
650		0	_aWĀHINE _94040
650		0	_aWOMEN _9645
650		4	_9650 _aWOMEN'S REFUGES
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700			_aQuince, Khylee _98428
700			_aMasselot, Annick _911533
700			_aMoir, Phoebe _911534
700			_aMcKechnie, Freya _911535
700			_aPhelps, Emma _911536
700			_aMurray-Ragg, Nadia _911537
700			_aVaii, Reina _911538
700			_aMander, Alice _911539
700			_aMaiden, Ella _911540
700			_aWerry, Kat _911541
700			_aMudgway, Cassandra _911542
700			_aAyoubi, Lida _911543
773	0	3	_tNew Zealand Women's Law Journal - Te Aho Kawe Kaupapa Ture a ngā Wāhine, 2022, 6
830			_97305 _aNew Zealand Women's Law Journal - Te Aho Kawe Kaupapa Ture a ngā Wāhine
856			_uhttps://static1.squarespace.com/static/577228a5e4fcb512c064f2a7/t/62e0d44c65bdcd723196bbc1/1658901585207/NZWLJ+2022+Special+Edition.pdf _zAccess all papers in this Special edition
942			_2ddc _cPERIODICAL _hnews116