000 | 03162nab a22004097a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c7930 _d7930 |
||
005 | 20250625151627.0 | ||
008 | 221128s2022 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aRoguski, Michael _92026 |
||
245 |
_aTe Pou : _ban indigenous framework to evaluate the inclusion of family voice in family violence homicide reviews _cMichael Roguski, Dennis Grennell, Synthia Dash, Irene de Haan, Fiona Cram and Pauline Gulliver |
||
260 |
_bSpringer, _c2022 |
||
500 | _aJournal of Family Violence, 2022, 39: 325-337 | ||
520 | _a Purpose Within this paper we evaluate the inclusion of the family voice in the domestic homicide review process. We use an Indigenous rubric (Te Pou) developed to ensure a culturally appropriate framework for conducting fatality reviews. We further draw on the creative potential of Indigenous knowledge systems, applying them alongside Western understandings of the engagement of family in homicide reviews, to seed new knowledge. This review has been undertaken early in the process of implementing family interviews to learn from current practices, seeking to improve them and, thereby, be better hosts for those invited to be part of a review. Methods The process of including family input into the in-depth reviews of family violence homicide reviews, conducted between October 2019 and November 2021, was reviewed against the guidelines specified within Te Pou. Results While there were strengths within the current process, the review established that further work is required to fully embed cultural understandings and processes within homicide reviews. Indeed, the current process and legislative framework in which it is based, works against relational obligations of reciprocity and a duty to care. Conclusions Using indigenous frameworks and research methods, it is possible to determine how homicide review processes have the potential to embed trauma rather than providing an opportunity for critical reflection and healing. Repositioning homicide reviews will require a reconceptualization of the legislative framework and support system requirements for review panels. (Authors' abstract). Record #7930 | ||
610 | 0 |
_aFamily Violence Death Review Committee | He tao huata e taea te karo _911693 |
|
650 |
_aCHILD ABUSE _9103 |
||
650 |
_aANGA _96926 |
||
650 |
_aFAMILIES _9238 |
||
650 |
_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252 |
||
650 |
_aHOMICIDE _9297 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aMĀORI _9357 |
||
650 |
_aPATU TAMARIKI _95534 |
||
650 |
_aRANGAHAU MĀORI _95532 |
||
650 |
_aTŪKINOTANGA Ā-WHĀNAU _95382 |
||
650 |
_aWHĀNAU _9642 |
||
650 | 4 |
_aTRAUMA _9612 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
|
700 |
_aGrennell, Dennis _911477 |
||
700 |
_aDash, Synthia _911478 |
||
700 |
_93712 _ade Haan, Irene |
||
700 |
_aCram, Fiona _9990 |
||
700 |
_aGulliver, Pauline _92705 |
||
773 | 0 | _tJournal of Family Violence, 2022, 39: 325-337 | |
830 |
_aJournal of Family Violence _94619 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00459-6 _zDOI: 10.1007/s10896-022-00459-6 (Open access) |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews116 |