000 03548nab a22004217a 4500
999 _c7853
_d7853
005 20250625151623.0
008 221012s2022 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aJud, Andreas
_94900
245 _aPrevalence and predictors of affirmations of intimate partner violence in Germany :
_ba first nationwide study on victimization in women and men
_cAndreas Jud, Bianca Grafe, Ksenia Meshkova, Barbara Kavemann, Thomas Meysen, Ulrike Hoffmann, Ute Ziegenhain and Jörg Fegert
260 _bSage,
_c2022
500 _aJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2022, First published online, 26 April 2022
520 _aLarge-size studies on the prevalence of female intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization in Germany are rare and partly outdated; representative data on male IPV victimization are lacking altogether. The present survey addresses these gaps. For this study, the instrument of the WHO Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence has been translated to German and adapted to be used with females and males. A random route procedure in selecting household addresses has been used to gather data on IPV in combination with an omnibus survey on (mental) health issues. A total 2,503 respondents with a minimum age of 14 years have participated (response rate=44.1%). The resulting distribution of age and gender was representative for the German population above the age of 14 years. A total of 57.6% of female participants and 50.8% of male participants have reported victimization by intimate partners during their lifespan; gender distribution differs significantly (Chi2=43.43; p<0.001). Out of the different documented subtypes, psychological IPV was most prevalent (53.6% in females, 48.0% in males). Other forms ranged between 15.2% (physical IPV) and 18.6% (sexual IPV) for females, and 5.5% (sexual IPV) and 10.8% (physical IPV) for males. All forms of victimization regularly coincided, both in females and males. Experiencing any IPV was not only significantly associated with female gender, but also with older age, periods of unemployment, poverty, and IPV perpetration. The findings highlight the still much needed global efforts to prevent IPV against women – and in general. They further support previous research in underlining that fighting poverty might also be instrumental in reducing the likelihood of IPV. The discussion further addresses the issues of reciprocity in IPV. (Authors' abstract). Record #7853
650 _aABUSED MEN
_924
650 _aABUSED WOMEN
_925
650 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 _aECONOMIC ABUSE
_93432
650 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 _aOLDER PEOPLE
_9414
650 4 _9439
_aPHYSICAL ABUSE
650 4 _aPREVALENCE
_9457
650 4 _aPSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE
_9472
650 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
650 0 _96538
_aSOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
651 _aGERMANY
_95137
700 _aGrafe, Bianca
_911328
700 _aMeshkova, Ksenia
_911329
700 _aKavemann, Barbara
_911330
700 _aMeysen, Thomas
_911331
700 _aHoffmann, Ulrike
_911332
700 _aZiegenhain, Ute
_911333
700 _aFegert, Jörg
_911334
773 0 _tJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2022, First published online, 26 April 2022
830 _aJournal of Interpersonal Violence
_94621
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221092066
_zDOI: 10.1177/08862605221092066 (Open access)
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE
_hnews115