000 03101nab a22003497a 4500
999 _c7809
_d7809
005 20250625151621.0
008 220901s2022 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aEmezue, Chuka
_911265
245 _aTechnology‐based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence :
_ba systematic review and meta-analysis
_cChuka Emezue, Jo-Ana D. Chase, Tipparat Udmuangpia and Tina L. Bloom
260 _bWiley,
_c2022
500 _aCampbell Systematic Reviews, 2022, e1271
520 _aBackground:A growing body of research shows the promise and efficacy oftechnology‐based or digital interventions in improving the health and well‐being ofsurvivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). In addition, mental health comorbiditiessuch as anxiety, post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression occur three tofive times more frequently in survivors of IPV than non‐survivors, making thesecomorbidities prominent targets of technology‐based interventions. Still, research onthe long‐term effectiveness of these interventions in reducing IPV victimization andadverse mental health effects is emergent. The significant increase in the numberof trials studying technology‐based therapies on IPV‐related outcomes has allowedus to quantify the effectiveness of such interventions for mental health andvictimization outcomes in survivors. This meta‐analysis and systematic reviewprovide critical insight from several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on theoverall short and long‐term impact of technology‐based interventions on the healthand well‐being of female IPV survivors Authors' Conclusions:The results of this meta‐analysis are promising. Our findingshighlight the effectiveness of IPV‐mitigating digital intervention as an add‐on (not areplacement) to traditional modalities using a coordinated response strategy. Ourfindings contribute to the current understanding of“what works”to promotesurvivors' mental health, safety, and well‐being. Future research could advance thescience by identifying active intervention ingredients, mapping out interventionprinciples/mechanisms of action, best modes of delivery, adequate dosage levelsusing the treatment intensity matching process, and guidelines to increase feasibilityand acceptability. (From the abstract). Record #7809
650 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 _aINTERVENTION
_9326
650 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 _aONLINE TOOLS
_97276
650 0 _aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
_93140
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
651 4 _aAUSTRALIA
_92597
651 4 _aCANADA
_92602
651 _aCHINA
_93612
651 4 _aNEW ZEALAND
_92588
651 4 _aUNITED STATES
_92646
700 _aChase, Jo-Ana D.
_911266
700 _aUdmuangpia, Tipparat
_911267
700 _aBloom, Tina L.
_96478
773 0 _tCampbell Systematic Review, 2022, e1271
830 _aCampbell Systemaatic Reviews
_94696
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1271
_zDOI: 10.1002/cl2.1271 (Open access)
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE
_hnews114