000			03408nab a22003377a 4500
999			_c7798 _d7798
005			20250625151620.0
008			220831s2022 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aWilliamson, Emma _94047
245			_aSecondary trauma : _bemotional safety in sensitive research _cEmma Williamson, Alison Gregory, Hilary Abrahams, Nadia Aghtaie, Sarah-Jane Walker and Marianne Hester
260			_bSpringer, _c2020
500			_aJournal of Academic Ethics, 2020, 18: 55-70
520			_aSecondary trauma (ST) refers to the impact of indirect exposure to traumatic experiences; effects which can be ‘disruptive and painful’ and can ‘persist for months or years’ (McCann and Pearlman 1990). The effects, as described by McCann, in relation to working directly with clients, are considered to be a usual response which results from witnessing a distressing traumatic event or from knowledge about such an event, particularly if the person is connected with the victim-survivor (Figley 1998). ST is one of a number of terms used somewhat interchangeably (including vicarious trauma, burnout, compassion fatigue) to convey ideas about the transference, or rippling-out effects, of trauma from the original incident and the original victim-survivor. Burnout is more usually related to the demands of work (including caregiving and studying) and its contextual components, such as long hours, insufficient support or control, and heavy workload, than the specific nature of work involved, and thus may be different, if overlapping, with the topic we are looking at (Freudenberger 1974). Brown (2017) refers to the Maslach Burnout Inventory (2015), which differentiates burnout from other forms of exhaustion or depression, due to its inclusion of an element of compassion fatigue. It is this aspect which those with caring responsibilities find particularly difficult to acknowledge and address. Because this previous research has often focused on front line workers rather than researchers and we know collectively very little about the impacts of studying trauma on this group, we use the term ST within this paper as a more descriptive term which doesn’t imply an outcome or particular impacts, yet can include a similar range of impacts found in the phenomena of burnout or compassion fatigue. The term secondary trauma is not ideal but it is important to recognise where this paper sits in relation to the wider literature on the impacts of working with trauma as the focus of ones work. We also use the term ‘emotional safety’ to recognise ways in which the potential for ST can be acknowledged. (From the authors' introduction). Record #7798
650			_aMENTAL HEALTH _9377
650			_aRESEARCH _9497
650			_aRESEARCH ETHICS _9498
650			_aSTRESS _9582
650		4	_aTRAUMA _9612
650		0	_aVIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN _93088
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aUNITED KINGDOM _92604
700			_aGregory, Alison _96610
700			_aAbrahams, Hilary _9683
700			_aAghtaie, Nadia _911228
700			_aWalker, Sarah-Jane _911229
700			_aHester, Marianne _91347
773	0		_tJournal of Academic Ethics, 2020, 18: 55-70
830			_aJournal of Academic Ethics _911230
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09348-y _zDOI: 10.1007/s10805-019-09348-y (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews114