000			02196nab a22003017a 4500
999			_c7698 _d7698
005			20250625151616.0
008			220706s2022 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aPfitzner, Naomi _99238
245			_aBody-worn cameras : _ban effective or cosmetic policing response to domestic and family violence? _cNaomi Pfitzner, Sandra Walklate and Jude McCulloch
260			_bSage, _c2022
490	0		_aCriminology & Criminal Justice
500			_aCriminology & Criminal Justice, 2022, First published online, 2 July 2022
520			_aDrawing together the literature on police body-worn cameras and video-recorded evidence in domestic and family violence matters, this article explores whether technology can ‘fix’ criminal justice responses to domestic and family violence. We argue that the use of police body-worn cameras and digitally recorded audio-visual evidence in domestic and family violence matters is not a cure-all for deficiencies in criminal justice responses to domestic and family violence. While the use of such technologies may alleviate some of the deficiencies highlighted in the Australian state of Victoria’s 2016 Royal Commission into Family Violence, it raises serious concerns about victim’s agency and privacy. We argue that the introduction of such technologies requires significant investment in training and education – for police to adapt to their changed role and for judicial officers, legal practitioners and potential jurors in understanding and interpreting victim survivor behaviour on film. (Authors' abstract). Record #7698
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aJUSTICE _9333
650		4	_9445 _aPOLICE PROCEDURES
650			_aTECHNOLOGY _9599
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
700			_aWalklate, Sandra _96173
700			_aMcCulloch, Jude _95462
773	0		_tCriminology & Criminal Justice, 2022, First published online, 2 July 2022
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221108478 _zDOI: 10.1177/17488958221108478
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE _hnews112