000 03501nab a22003377a 4500
999 _c7531
_d7531
005 20250625151608.0
008 220301s2022 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aMeyer, Sarah R.
_910742
245 _aA scoping review of measurement of violence against women and disability
_cSarah R. Meyer, Heidi Stöckl, Cecilia Vorfeld, Kaloyan Kamenov and Claudia Garcia-Moreno
260 _bPLoS,
_c2022
500 _aPLoS One, 2022, First published online, 31 January 2022
520 _aExisting evidence indicates that prevalence of violence against women with disability is elevated compared to women without disability. We conducted a scoping review with a focus on measurement to assess the forms of measurement and study design utilized to explore the intersection of violence against women with disabilities, and to identify strengths and limitations in current approaches to measuring violence against women with disabilities. This scoping review is designed to inform current debates and discussions regarding how to generate evidence concerning violence against women with disabilities. Methods and results: We conducted systematic searches of the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, PILOTS, ERIC, Social Work Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Social Services Abstracts, ProQuest Criminal Justice, and Dissertations & Theses Global, and conducted structured searches of national statistics and surveys and grey literature available on-line. We identified 174 manuscripts or reports for inclusion. n = 113 manuscripts or reports utilized acts-specific measurement of violence. In terms of measurement of disability, we found that amongst the included manuscripts and reports, n = 75 utilized measures of functioning limitations (n = 20 of these were Washington Group questions), n = 15 utilized a single question approach and n = 67 defined participants in the research as having a disability based on a diagnosis or self-report of a health condition or impairment. Discussion: This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of measurement of violence against women with disabilities and measurement of violence within disability-focused research. We identified several important gaps in the evidence, including lack of sex and disability disaggregation, limited evidence concerning adaptation of data collection methods to ensure accessibility of research activities for women with disabilities, and limited evidence concerning differential relationships between types of disability and violence exposure. This scoping review provides directions for sub-analyses of the included studies and further research to address gaps in evidence. (Authors' abstract). #7531
650 _aDATA COLLECTION
_9182
650 _aDISABLED PEOPLE
_9196
650 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 _aPREVALENCE
_9457
650 _aRESEARCH METHODS
_9499
650 0 _aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
_93140
650 0 _aVIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
_93088
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
700 _aStöckl, Heidi
_99998
700 _aVorfeld, Cecilia
_910757
700 _aKamenov, Kaloyan
_910758
700 _91200
_aGarcia-Moreno, Claudia
773 0 _tPLoS One, 2022, First published online, 31 January 2022
830 _aPLoS One
_94620
856 _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0263020
_zDOI: 10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0263020 (Open access)
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE