000			03501nab a22003377a 4500
999			_c7531 _d7531
005			20250625151608.0
008			220301s2022 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aMeyer, Sarah R. _910742
245			_aA scoping review of measurement of violence against women and disability _cSarah R. Meyer, Heidi Stöckl, Cecilia Vorfeld, Kaloyan Kamenov and Claudia Garcia-Moreno
260			_bPLoS, _c2022
500			_aPLoS One, 2022, First published online, 31 January 2022
520			_aExisting evidence indicates that prevalence of violence against women with disability is elevated compared to women without disability. We conducted a scoping review with a focus on measurement to assess the forms of measurement and study design utilized to explore the intersection of violence against women with disabilities, and to identify strengths and limitations in current approaches to measuring violence against women with disabilities. This scoping review is designed to inform current debates and discussions regarding how to generate evidence concerning violence against women with disabilities. Methods and results: We conducted systematic searches of the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, PILOTS, ERIC, Social Work Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Social Services Abstracts, ProQuest Criminal Justice, and Dissertations & Theses Global, and conducted structured searches of national statistics and surveys and grey literature available on-line. We identified 174 manuscripts or reports for inclusion. n = 113 manuscripts or reports utilized acts-specific measurement of violence. In terms of measurement of disability, we found that amongst the included manuscripts and reports, n = 75 utilized measures of functioning limitations (n = 20 of these were Washington Group questions), n = 15 utilized a single question approach and n = 67 defined participants in the research as having a disability based on a diagnosis or self-report of a health condition or impairment. Discussion: This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of measurement of violence against women with disabilities and measurement of violence within disability-focused research. We identified several important gaps in the evidence, including lack of sex and disability disaggregation, limited evidence concerning adaptation of data collection methods to ensure accessibility of research activities for women with disabilities, and limited evidence concerning differential relationships between types of disability and violence exposure. This scoping review provides directions for sub-analyses of the included studies and further research to address gaps in evidence. (Authors' abstract). #7531
650			_aDATA COLLECTION _9182
650			_aDISABLED PEOPLE _9196
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aPREVALENCE _9457
650			_aRESEARCH METHODS _9499
650		0	_aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS _93140
650		0	_aVIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN _93088
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
700			_aStöckl, Heidi _99998
700			_aVorfeld, Cecilia _910757
700			_aKamenov, Kaloyan _910758
700			_91200 _aGarcia-Moreno, Claudia
773	0		_tPLoS One, 2022, First published online, 31 January 2022
830			_aPLoS One _94620
856			_uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0263020 _zDOI: 10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0263020 (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE