000 | 03092nab a22003377a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c7272 _d7272 |
||
005 | 20250625151556.0 | ||
008 | 210823s2021 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aEasteal, Patricia _95354 |
||
245 |
_aDo survivors feel protected by family violence legislation? _bReflections on the (ACT) from those with lived experience _c Patricia Easteal, Lorana Bartels, Shannon Dodd and Jessica White |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2021 |
||
500 | _aJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2021, Advance online publication, 9 August 2021 | ||
520 | _aCivil protection order legislation is the primary mechanism in each of Australia’s eight jurisdictions’ system-based response to domestic and family violence (DFV). There are many differences across the states’ and territories’ legislation, with each amended numerous times since their inception in the early 1980s. The latter is exemplified by the new Australian Capital Territory (ACT) legislative framework, the Family Violence Act 2016 (ACT) (the Act), which was introduced in 2017, following a number of high-profile intimate partner homicides. The aim of the Act was to better protect those who fear, experience or witness family violence (FV). This article reflects on whether that aim is being achieved, from the perspective of those with lived FV experience. We conducted in-depth interviews with eight people who identified as having lived experience (LE) with the Act. The open-ended questions were designed to elicit their observations, experiences, and suggestions concerning the black letter provisions and their implementation. The theme of safety emerged strongly as issues were revealed, including waiting for orders to be served, their duration, the exclusion of children, limits of the definition of FV, such as the omission of cultural and technology-facilitated abuse, as well as inadequate interagency cooperation and information sharing. Their reflections highlight that, while some improvements have indeed been made, there often remains a lack of protection for victims. Drawing on these experiences, we put forward recommendations for amendments to the current regime, which may further promote victim and community safety and reiterate the importance of listening to the voices of those at the coalface of experiencing FV. (Authors' abstract). Record #7272 | ||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aJUSTICE _9333 |
||
650 |
_aPROTECTION ORDERS _9470 |
||
650 |
_aSAFETY _9511 |
||
650 | 0 |
_99763 _aVICTIM/SURVIVORS' VOICES |
|
651 |
_aINTERNATIONAL _93624 |
||
651 | 4 |
_aAUSTRALIA _92597 |
|
651 |
_aACT _910240 |
||
700 |
_aBartels, Lorana _97846 |
||
700 |
_aDodd, Shannon _910241 |
||
700 |
_aWhite, Jessica _910242 |
||
773 | 0 | _tJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2021, Advance online publication, 9 August 2021 | |
830 |
_aJournal of Interpersonal Violence _94621 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177%2F08862605211035885 _zDOI: 10.1177%2F08862605211035885 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |