000			03271nab a22003857a 4500
999			_c7187 _d7187
005			20250625151552.0
008			210615s2021 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_91374 _aHoltzworth-Munroe, Amy
245			_aIntimate partner violence (IPV) and family dispute resolution : _ba randomized controlled trial comparing shuttle mediation, videoconferencing mediation, and litigation _cAmy Holtzworth-Munroe, Connie J. Beck, Amy G. Applegate, Jeannie M. Adams, Fernanda S. Rossi, Lily J. Jiang, Claire S. Tomlinson and Darrell F. Hale
260			_bAmerican Psychological Association, _c2021
500			_aPsychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2021, 27(1): 45-64
520			_aThis randomized controlled trial, involving parents seeking to resolve their separation- or divorce-related disputes and reporting high levels of intimate partner violence (IPV), compared return-to-court (traditional litigation, n = 67 cases) to 2 mediation approaches designed to protect parent safety (i.e., shuttle, n = 64 cases; videoconferencing, n = 65 cases) at a court-annexed mediation division. We present immediate outcomes, which showed some favorable results for mediation. Both mediation approaches were perceived as safe by mediators, and parents felt safer in mediation than in traditional litigation. Parents in mediation were also more satisfied with the process than parents in traditional litigation. Return-to-court cases took 3 times as long to reach final resolution as mediation cases. Mediators tended to prefer shuttle over videoconferencing, and videoconferencing cases were half as likely to reach agreement as cases in shuttle. Through coding the content of the document that resolved case issues, we found no statistically significant group differences in legal custody, physical custody, or parenting time arrangements, and few differences in the likelihood of the document specifying a variety of arrangements (e.g., how to handle missed parenting time) or including safety provisions (e.g., supervised child exchanges). We conclude that in cases with parents reporting concerning levels of IPV, when both parents are independently willing to mediate, mediation designed with strong safety protocols and carried out in a protected environment by well-trained staff may be an appropriate alternative to court. (Authors' abstract). Record #8187
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aFAMILY COURT _9241
650		0	_95471 _aFAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTION
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aJUSTICE _9333
650			_aMEDIATION _95472
650			_aRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS _99368
650			_aTECHNOLOGY _9599
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aUNITED STATES _92646
700			_aBeck, Connie J. _910074
700			_aApplegate, Amy G. _910075
700			_aAdams, Jeannie M. _910076
700			_aRossi, Fernanda S. _910077
700			_aJiang, Lily J. _910078
700			_aTomlinson, Claire S. _910079
700			_aHale, Darrell F. _910080
773	0		_tPsychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2021, 27(1): 45-64
830			_aPsychology, Public Policy, and Law _99936
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1037/law0000278 _zDOI: 10.1037/law0000278
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE