000			03195nam a22003497a 4500
999			_c7174 _d7174
005			20250625151552.0
008			210610s2021 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_bAFVC
100			_aRobinson, Sally _95084
245			_aDisability and family violence prevention : _ba case study on participation in evidence making _cSally Robinson, Kylie Valentine and Jan Idle
260			_bIngenta, _c2021
500			_aEvidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021, 17(2): 315-333
520			_aBackground: The paper draws on empirical evidence from a project investigating service responses to disabled women and children experiencing domestic and family violence (DFV). Service provision in these sectors is often rationed due to resource constraints, and increasingly marketised, and disabled people often do not have their needs met. Their opportunities for participation in policy and practice are also constrained. Aims and objectives: Our aim is to bring critical studies of intersectionality into dialogue with ‘evidence-making’ scholarship on policy implementation, to allow for new analyses of the inclusion of lived experience expertise in policy. We ask: What are the potential drivers for new forms of practice and evidence making in policy and service settings? Methods: The multi-method study comprised literature and policy review and qualitative research about the experience and implementation of an early intervention violence prevention support programme. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with mothers (n=27) and children (n=7), and service providers (n=28). Findings: Many mothers did not identify as disabled, although they discussed the effects of impairment. However, children were all diagnosed, and diagnosis was a means of accessing funding and services. The service was focused on brokering responses to family needs, and formal participation mechanisms for clients were not prioritised. Discussion and conclusion: Resource constraints and workforce capacity are ongoing concerns in the disability and violence prevention sectors. Relationships that facilitate trust, agency and choice remain key. Insights from critical policy scholarship suggest opportunities to recognise existing relationships as participation, with implications for policy and practice. (Author's abstract). Record #7174
650			_aCHILD ABUSE _9103
650			_aDISABLED PEOPLE _9196
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252
650			_aINTERVENTION _9326
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aPREVENTION _9458
650		4	_aSUPPORT SERVICES _9591
650		4	_aVICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9624
650			_aWORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT _94320
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
700			_aValentine, Kylie _95338
700			_aIdle, Jan _910056
773	0	3	_tEvidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021, 17(2): 315-333
830			_aEvidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice _99827
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16143457505305 _yDOI: 10.1332/174426421X16143457505305
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE