000 | 03224naB a22003857a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c6973 _d6973 |
||
005 | 20250625151542.0 | ||
008 | 210120s2020 -nz|| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aOverall, Nickola C. _95497 |
||
245 |
_aSexist attitudes predict family - based aggression during a COVID-19 lockdown _cNickola C. Overall, Valerie T. Chang, E.J. Cross, S.T. Low and A.M.E. Henderson |
||
260 | _c2020 | ||
500 | _aJournal of Family Psychology, 2020, In press | ||
520 | _aThe current research examined whether men’s hostile sexism was a risk factor for family-based aggression during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown in which families were confined to the home for 5 weeks. Parents who had reported on their sexist attitudes and aggressive behavior toward intimate partners and children prior to the COVID-19 pandemic completed assessments of aggressive behavior toward their partners and children during the lockdown (N = 362 parents of which 310 were drawn from the same family). Accounting for pre-lockdown levels of aggression, men who more strongly endorsed hostile sexism reported greater aggressive behavior toward their intimate partners and their children during the lockdown. The contextual factors that help explain these longitudinal associations differed across targets of family-based aggression. Men’s hostile sexism predicted greater aggression toward intimate partners when men experienced low power during couples’ interactions, whereas men’s hostile sexism predicted greater aggressive parenting when men reported lower partner-child relationship quality. Novel effects also emerged for benevolent sexism. Men’s higher benevolent sexism predicted lower aggressive parenting, and women’s higher benevolent sexism predicted greater aggressive behavior toward partners, irrespective of power and relationship quality. The current study provides the first longitudinal demonstration that men’s hostile sexism predicts residual changes in aggression toward both intimate partners and children. Such aggressive behavior will intensify the health, well-being, and developmental costs of the pandemic, highlighting the importance of targeting power-related gender role beliefs when screening for aggression risk and delivering therapeutic and education interventions as families face the unprecedented challenges of COVID-19. (Authors' abstract). Record #6973 | ||
650 |
_aAGGRESSION _952 |
||
650 |
_aATTITUDES _970 |
||
650 |
_aCHILD ABUSE _9103 |
||
650 |
_aCOVID-19 _98949 |
||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aMEN _9375 |
||
650 |
_aPANDEMICS _98950 |
||
650 |
_aPARENTING _9429 |
||
650 |
_aRISK FACTORS _9505 |
||
650 | 0 |
_96507 _aSEXISM |
|
651 | 4 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
|
700 |
_aChang, Valerie T. _99648 |
||
700 |
_aCross, Emily J. _95498 |
||
700 |
_aLow, Rachel S. T. _912509 |
||
700 |
_aHenderson, Annette M. E. _99649 |
||
773 | 0 | _tJournal of Family Psychology, 2020, In press | |
830 |
_aJournal of Family Violence _94619 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p23bv _yDOI: 10.31234/osf.io/p23bv (Open access) |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |