000 | 03246nab a22003617a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c6938 _d6938 |
||
005 | 20250625151540.0 | ||
008 | 201215s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_97123 _aDunkle, Kristin |
||
245 |
_aHow do programmes to prevent intimate partner violence among the general population impact women with disabilities? _bPost-hoc analysis of three randomised controlled trials _cKristin Dunkle, Andrew Gibbs, Esnat Chirwa, Erin Stern, Ingrid Van Der Heijden and Laura Washington |
||
260 |
_bBMJ Journals, _c2020 |
||
500 | _aBMJ Global Health, 2020, 5(12): 14 pages | ||
520 | _aIntroduction Women with disabilities experience higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) than women without disabilities. There remains limited evidence about whether IPV prevention interventions for the general population have benefits for women with disabilities that compare to those for women without disabilities. Using data from IPV prevention randomised controlled trials in diverse locations (Rwanda, South Africa and Afghanistan), we assess whether outcomes differed by disability status. Methods We assessed disability at baseline in three IPV prevention trials. We performed post-hoc analysis of intervention impacts at endline (22 or 24 months post-baseline) stratified by disability status at study baseline and tested an interaction term for disability at baseline by intervention arm for three sets of outcomes: (1) past year experiences of physical, sexual and severe IPV; (2) economic and livelihood outcomes; and (3) health, mental health and substance use outcomes. Results At baseline between 17.7% and 26.2% of women reported being disabled. For IPV prevention, in seven out of eight tests across three studies, women with and without disabilities had similar outcomes. For economic, health and substance use outcomes, there was more variation, with women with disabilities reporting both better and worse outcomes than women without disabilities; however there was no clear pattern in these differential results. Conclusion IPV prevention programmes targeting general populations can prevent IPV among women with disabilities participants with benefits that mirror those for women without disabilities. Benefits for participants with and without disabilities on secondary programme outcomes related to economic empowerment and health may be more varied and should be explicitly monitored. (Authors' abstract). Record #6938 | ||
650 |
_aDISABLED PEOPLE _9196 |
||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aPREVENTION _9458 |
||
650 |
_aRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS _99368 |
||
650 |
_aWOMEN _9645 |
||
651 |
_aINTERNATIONAL _93624 |
||
651 |
_aAFGHANISTAN _98720 |
||
651 |
_aRWANDA _93779 |
||
651 |
_aSOUTH AFRICA _93486 |
||
700 |
_aGibbs, Andrew _97126 |
||
700 |
_aChirwa, Esnat _99580 |
||
700 |
_aStern, Erin _95244 |
||
700 |
_94415 _aVan Der Heijden, Ingrid |
||
700 |
_aWashington, Laura _98927 |
||
773 | _tBMJ Global Health, 2020, 5(12): 14 pages | ||
830 |
_aBMJ Global Health _99581 |
||
856 |
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002216 _zDOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002216 (Open access) |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |