000			03246nab a22003617a 4500
999			_c6938 _d6938
005			20250625151540.0
008			201215s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_97123 _aDunkle, Kristin
245			_aHow do programmes to prevent intimate partner violence among the general population impact women with disabilities? _bPost-hoc analysis of three randomised controlled trials _cKristin Dunkle, Andrew Gibbs, Esnat Chirwa, Erin Stern, Ingrid Van Der Heijden and Laura Washington
260			_bBMJ Journals, _c2020
500			_aBMJ Global Health, 2020, 5(12): 14 pages
520			_aIntroduction Women with disabilities experience higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) than women without disabilities. There remains limited evidence about whether IPV prevention interventions for the general population have benefits for women with disabilities that compare to those for women without disabilities. Using data from IPV prevention randomised controlled trials in diverse locations (Rwanda, South Africa and Afghanistan), we assess whether outcomes differed by disability status. Methods We assessed disability at baseline in three IPV prevention trials. We performed post-hoc analysis of intervention impacts at endline (22 or 24 months post-baseline) stratified by disability status at study baseline and tested an interaction term for disability at baseline by intervention arm for three sets of outcomes: (1) past year experiences of physical, sexual and severe IPV; (2) economic and livelihood outcomes; and (3) health, mental health and substance use outcomes. Results At baseline between 17.7% and 26.2% of women reported being disabled. For IPV prevention, in seven out of eight tests across three studies, women with and without disabilities had similar outcomes. For economic, health and substance use outcomes, there was more variation, with women with disabilities reporting both better and worse outcomes than women without disabilities; however there was no clear pattern in these differential results. Conclusion IPV prevention programmes targeting general populations can prevent IPV among women with disabilities participants with benefits that mirror those for women without disabilities. Benefits for participants with and without disabilities on secondary programme outcomes related to economic empowerment and health may be more varied and should be explicitly monitored. (Authors' abstract). Record #6938
650			_aDISABLED PEOPLE _9196
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aPREVENTION _9458
650			_aRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS _99368
650			_aWOMEN _9645
651			_aINTERNATIONAL _93624
651			_aAFGHANISTAN _98720
651			_aRWANDA _93779
651			_aSOUTH AFRICA _93486
700			_aGibbs, Andrew _97126
700			_aChirwa, Esnat _99580
700			_aStern, Erin _95244
700			_94415 _aVan Der Heijden, Ingrid
700			_aWashington, Laura _98927
773			_tBMJ Global Health, 2020, 5(12): 14 pages
830			_aBMJ Global Health _99581
856			_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002216 _zDOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002216 (Open access)
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE