000 03246nab a22003617a 4500
999 _c6938
_d6938
005 20250625151540.0
008 201215s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _97123
_aDunkle, Kristin
245 _aHow do programmes to prevent intimate partner violence among the general population impact women with disabilities?
_bPost-hoc analysis of three randomised controlled trials
_cKristin Dunkle, Andrew Gibbs, Esnat Chirwa, Erin Stern, Ingrid Van Der Heijden and Laura Washington
260 _bBMJ Journals,
_c2020
500 _aBMJ Global Health, 2020, 5(12): 14 pages
520 _aIntroduction Women with disabilities experience higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) than women without disabilities. There remains limited evidence about whether IPV prevention interventions for the general population have benefits for women with disabilities that compare to those for women without disabilities. Using data from IPV prevention randomised controlled trials in diverse locations (Rwanda, South Africa and Afghanistan), we assess whether outcomes differed by disability status. Methods We assessed disability at baseline in three IPV prevention trials. We performed post-hoc analysis of intervention impacts at endline (22 or 24 months post-baseline) stratified by disability status at study baseline and tested an interaction term for disability at baseline by intervention arm for three sets of outcomes: (1) past year experiences of physical, sexual and severe IPV; (2) economic and livelihood outcomes; and (3) health, mental health and substance use outcomes. Results At baseline between 17.7% and 26.2% of women reported being disabled. For IPV prevention, in seven out of eight tests across three studies, women with and without disabilities had similar outcomes. For economic, health and substance use outcomes, there was more variation, with women with disabilities reporting both better and worse outcomes than women without disabilities; however there was no clear pattern in these differential results. Conclusion IPV prevention programmes targeting general populations can prevent IPV among women with disabilities participants with benefits that mirror those for women without disabilities. Benefits for participants with and without disabilities on secondary programme outcomes related to economic empowerment and health may be more varied and should be explicitly monitored. (Authors' abstract). Record #6938
650 _aDISABLED PEOPLE
_9196
650 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 _aPREVENTION
_9458
650 _aRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
_99368
650 _aWOMEN
_9645
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
651 _aAFGHANISTAN
_98720
651 _aRWANDA
_93779
651 _aSOUTH AFRICA
_93486
700 _aGibbs, Andrew
_97126
700 _aChirwa, Esnat
_99580
700 _aStern, Erin
_95244
700 _94415
_aVan Der Heijden, Ingrid
700 _aWashington, Laura
_98927
773 _tBMJ Global Health, 2020, 5(12): 14 pages
830 _aBMJ Global Health
_99581
856 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002216
_zDOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002216 (Open access)
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE