000 | 03080nam a22003017a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c6890 _d6890 |
||
005 | 20250625151538.0 | ||
008 | 201103s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
100 |
_aMeyer, Silke _94138 |
||
245 |
_aCombining group-based interventions for intimate partner violence perpetrators with comorbid substance use : _ban Australian study of cross-sector practitioner views _cSilke Meyer, Jessica Burley and Kate Fitz-Gibbon |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020 |
||
500 | _aJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2020, Advance online publication, 29 October 2020 | ||
520 | _aThe connection between intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration and problematic alcohol and/ or other drug (AOD) use has been well established in public health, social work and criminology research. Despite the overwhelming evidence of the correlation between these two problem behaviors, service systems addressing these issues have historically done so in siloed approaches to practice. AOD interventions have frequently been criticized for a lack of IPV focused assessment and practice. Similarly, specialist IPV interventions generally do not address clients’ underlying risk factors, including problematic AOD use, through holistic intervention approaches. Suggestions to combine IPV and AOD focused interventions for men who use violence are often met with skepticism, raising questions around which sector could deliver a combined intervention approach and how different ideological standpoints in client work can and should be integrated into a combined framework. In this article, we examine the views of key stakeholders (n = 10) involved in the funding, development and/ or delivery of different service responses to men who use IPV in an Australian jurisdiction. Drawing on qualitative interview and focus group data, we explore their views around combined, group-based interventions, including the perceived need for such intervention models along with sector readiness and key considerations critical in informing the combining of IPV and AOD focused perpetrator interventions. Stakeholder findings identify the need for holistic responses to perpetrators of IPV with comorbid problematic AOD use. Further, findings provide guidance for funding bodies and community service providers considering combined, group-based interventions for perpetrators of IPV with comorbid problematic AOD use. (Authors' abstract). Record #6890 | ||
650 |
_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203 |
||
650 |
_aINTERVENTION _9326 |
||
650 |
_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431 |
||
650 |
_aPERPETRATOR PROGRAMMES _92951 |
||
650 |
_aSUBSTANCE ABUSE _9584 |
||
650 | 4 |
_aSUPPORT SERVICES _9591 |
|
651 |
_aINTERNATIONAL _93624 |
||
651 | 4 |
_aAUSTRALIA _92597 |
|
700 |
_aBurley, Jessica _99237 |
||
700 |
_aFitz-Gibbon, Kate _96172 |
||
773 | 0 | _tJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2020, Advance online publication, 29 October 2020 | |
830 |
_aJournal of Interpersonal Violence _94621 |
||
856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520969244 _zDOI: 10.1177/0886260520969244 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |