000 02216nab a22002897a 4500
999 _c6796
_d6796
005 20250625151534.0
008 200820s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aKaganas, Felicity
_99340
245 _aGrandparent contact :
_banother presumption?
_cFelicity Kaganas and Christine Piper
260 _bTaylor & Francis,
_c2020
500 _aJournal of Social Work and Family Law, 2020, 42(2): 176-203
520 _aThis article reviews the debate about the enhancement of grandparents’ legal status in relation to their grandchildren. In particular, it observes that calls for a legal presumption in favour of grandparent contact with their grandchildren when family relationships break down were emboldened by the enactment in s1(2A) of the Children Act 1989 of a presumption that involvement of both parents in their children’s lives furthers children’s welfare. Proponents of grandparent rights argued that there should be a similar statutory presumption in favour of grandparent involvement. It is also argued that courts should strictly enforce child arrangement orders that give grandparents time with grandchildren. The article examines the welfare case for such involvement and concludes that there is no unequivocal evidence to support it. It also considers the effect of the presumption in s1(2A). The article concludes that to enact a similar presumption in favour of grandparents, to apply a de facto presumption, to enforce orders strictly and even to remove the leave requirement that currently exists, could prejudice the interests of mothers as well as children. (Authors' abstract). Record #6796
650 4 _aCONTACT (ACCESS)
_929
650 4 _aCONTACT (ACCESS)
_929
650 0 _aFAMILY LAW
_9244
650 0 _aGRANDPARENTS
_9276
650 0 _aMOTHERS
_9392
650 0 _aPARENTAL RIGHTS
_9427
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
651 4 _aUNITED KINGDOM
_92604
700 _aPiper, Christine
_99341
773 0 _tJournal of Social Work and Family Law, 2020, 42(2): 176-203
830 _aJournal of Social Work and Family Law
_99342
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2020.1751932
_zDOI: 10.1080/09649069.2020.1751932
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE