000 04308nam a22004937a 4500
999 _c6712
_d6712
005 20250625151530.0
008 200706s2020 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 _a978-1-925925-48-7 (online)
040 _aAFVC
100 _aChung, Donna
_9931
245 _aImproved accountability :
_cDonna Chung, Karen Upton-Davis, Reinie Cordier, Elena Campbell, Tim Wong, Michael Salter, Siobhan Austen, Patrick O'Leary, Jan Breckenridge, Rodney Vlais, Damian Green, Amy Pracilio, Amy Young, Ashlee Gore, Lynelle Watts, Sarah Wilkes-Gillan, Renee Speyer, Natasha Mahoney, Sarah Anderson and Tallace Bissett
_bthe role of perpetrator intervention systems
260 _aSydney, NSW :
_bAustralia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited (ANROWS),
_c2020
300 _aelectronic document (336 pages) ; PDF file
500 _aANROWS Research report, Issue 20, June 2020
520 _aThis project comprised ten research studies that examined Australian perpetrator intervention systems using a mixed methods approach. The studies focused on the most common pathways of identification, assessment and intervention with perpetrators and examined how the engagement and retention of perpetrators within systems can be enhanced. Together, the studies provide a comprehensive analysis of integrated systems and interventions for perpetrators, and a mapping of current domestic and family violence responses to perpetrators. (From the website). Part 3 of the collection provides descriptions of programs being delivered to increase the safety of victims/survivors and to bring about perpetrators’ behaviour change. Very different programs within PI systems have been selected, as they indicate how wide-ranging the responses are to the perpetrating of DFV. The first case study of a specialist response to sibling sexual abuse demonstrates how the focus on perpetrator accountability is not easily adopted when working with children and young people in this context. It also demonstrates how family responses to violence need to be very different in order for safety to be increased and for the risk of further abuse to be reduced. The second case study examines an MBCP and men’s pathways through such a program. It gives a detailed account of how many program participants have complex lives which intersect with their capacity and motivation to accept responsibility and make changes. While not the specific intent of the study, it also shows how these MBCP participants did not have a clear understanding of the how the justice system operated in relation to their own DFV justice system involvement. Participants did have an understanding of the conditions of PO and, where it was the case, that the court had ordered them to the MBCP. The case study also gives an insight into how MBCP facilitators view those they work with, and the challenges of bringing about a difference with the current MBCP methods. Record #6712
650 4 _aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9203
650 4 _aCHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
_9121
650 4 _aFAMILY VIOLENCE
_9252
650 4 _aINTERVENTION
_9326
650 4 _aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
_9431
650 4 _aMEN
_9375
650 4 _aPERPETRATOR PROGRAMMES
_92951
650 4 _aPERPETRATORS
_92644
650 4 _aPREVENTION
_9458
650 4 _aSAFETY
_9511
650 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
650 4 _aSIBLING ABUSE
_9539
650 4 _aVICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
_9624
650 0 _aVICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE
_96716
651 4 _aAUSTRALIA
_92597
651 _aINTERNATIONAL
_93624
700 _aUpton-Davis, Karen
_99209
700 _aCordier, Reinie
_99210
700 _aCampbell, Elena
_99211
700 _aWong, Tim
_99212
700 _aSalter, Michael....
_92992
700 _aBissett, Tallace
_99213
773 0 3 _tANROWS Research report, Issue 20, June 2020
830 _97892
_aANROWS Research report
856 _uhttps://www.anrows.org.au/publication/improved-accountability-the-role-of-perpetrator-intervention-systems/
856 _uhttps://d2rn9gno7zhxqg.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/30164742/ANROWS-Chung-Improved_accountability-RtPP.pdf
_zSummary
856 _uhttps://www.anrows.org.au/project/improved-accountability-the-role-of-perpetrator-intervention-systems/
_zProject website
942 _2ddc
_cREPORT