000 | 02869nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c6393 _d6393 |
||
005 | 20250625151515.0 | ||
008 | 190923s2011 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _aAFVC | ||
245 |
_a1000 days to get it right for every child : _bthe effectiveness of public investment in New Zealand children _cA report prepared by Infometrics Ltd for Every Child Counts |
||
260 |
_bEvery Child Counts, _c2011 |
||
300 | _aelectronic document (60 pages) ; PDF file | ||
500 | _aEvery Child Counts Discussion Paper Number 2, August 2011 | ||
520 | _aThe effectiveness of public investment in New Zealand children underlines the economic cost resulting from inadequate investment in young children. Using a human capital framework, the report documents the economic impacts of poor child outcomes. The focus is solely economic and does not address political, social equity or child rights implications of child outcomes. It is entirely evidence based and draws upon a wide range of international literature. Drawing on OECD data, Infometrics find that child outcomes in New Zealand are typically almost twice as bad as outcomes obtained in Denmark, which is the best performing of thirty OECD countries. Greater levels of investment in early-years education, health and poverty reduction are warranted by economic analysis of positive impacts, but are not in themselves sufficient. Firstly, it should be observed that economic growth and prosperity typically improve child outcomes. Secondly, the effectiveness of early childhood policies, programmes and interventions vary considerably from one country to another. Not only is New Zealand one of the poorest performing countries of the OECD in terms of cold outcomes, but its results for every dollar spent is among the least effective. North European countries such as Denmark achieve the best outcomes with the highest rates of per child public spend. The Netherlands achieve a startling result. Although they spend only a fraction per child of the Nordic countries they achieve nearly comparable child outcomes. In other words, their programmes are very effective and much less costly. It needs to be borne in mind, though, that their public expenditure per child is nearly twice that of New Zealand’s. (From the Executive summary). Record #6393 | ||
610 |
_aEvery Child Counts _96007 |
||
650 |
_aCHILDREN _9127 |
||
650 | 5 |
_9216 _aECONOMIC POLICY |
|
650 | 5 |
_aINFANTS _9313 |
|
650 | 5 |
_aSOCIAL POLICY _9551 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
|
710 |
_aInfometrics _98624 |
||
773 | 0 | 3 | _tEvery Child Counts Discussion Paper Number 2, August 2011 |
856 | _uhttp://www.hauora.co.nz/assets/files/Children/1000-days-to-get-it-right-for-every-child.pdf | ||
856 |
_uhttps://everychildcounts.org.nz/The+effectiveness+of+public+investment+in+New+Zealand+children _zAccess the website |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cREPORT |