000 01833nab a22003497a 4500
999 _c6379
_d6379
005 20250625151515.0
008 190909s2017 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aHall, Katherine
_98597
245 _aTo report or not to report? :
_bThat is the question
_cKatherine Hall, Emma Donaldson and Martyn Williamson
260 _bCSIRO,
_c2017
500 _aJournal of Primary Health Care, 2017, 9(4):244–247
520 _aIn New Zealand general practices, we come across adolescents who are sexually active. It is quite clear in New Zealand law that everyone (including minors) who has sexual connection with a young person below the age of 16 years is potentially liable for prosecution and imprisonment. In the UK, there is mandatory reporting of all sexually active children aged 13 years or less.3,4 Many people feel that every instance of under-age intercourse should be reported to the police; however, mandatory reporting can be counter-productive. (From the introduction). This article discusses the ethical issues for general practitioners using the case study involving a young woman. Record #6379
650 _aADOLESCENT RELATIONSHIP ABUSE
_93080
650 _aADOLESCENTS
_943
650 _aCHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
_9121
650 _aCONSENT
_94690
650 _aDISCLOSURE
_9199
650 0 _95807
_aETHICS
650 5 _9370
_aMEDICAL PROFESSION
650 0 _aREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
_93274
650 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
650 _aYOUNG MEN
_9658
650 _aYOUNG WOMEN
_9661
651 4 _aNEW ZEALAND
_92588
700 _aDonaldson, Emma
_98598
700 _aWilliamson, Martyn
_98599
773 0 _tJournal of Primary Health Care, 2017, 9(4):244–247
830 _aJournal of Primary Health Care
_98600
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1071/HC16064
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE