000			02096nab a22002657a 4500
999			_c6296 _d6296
005			20250625151511.0
008			190612s2019 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aLeigh, Jadwiga _98909
245			_aDisguised compliance or undisguised nonsense? _bA critical discourse analysis of compliance and resistance in social work practice _cJadwiga Leigh, Liz Beddoe and Emily Keddell
260			_bPolicy Press, _c2019
500			_aFamilies, Relationships and Societies, 2019, Advance online publication, 28 May 2019
520			_aThis article examines how the term ‘disguised compliance’ first emerged and developed into the popular catchphrase that is used in practice today. Using critical discourse analysis, we explore how language affects practice and how social workers draw on a predetermined concept to rationalise concerns relating to parental resistance. We contend that concepts such as disguised compliance are misleading as they do not improve social workers’ abilities in detecting resistance or compliance. Instead, we argue that social workers should be cautious when using popular mantras which, on the surface, appear effective in describing parents’ behaviours but, in reality, conceal concerns relating to risk, accountability and blame. This study differs from the current literature that advocates social workers should be aware of disguised compliance by shifting the emphasis away from the behaviours of parents and towards acknowledging the power such discursive activities can have on practice. (Authors' abstract). Record #6296
650			_aATTITUDES _970
650			_aCHILD PROTECTION _9118
650			_aPARENTS _9430
650		5	_9562 _aSOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700			_96608 _aBeddoe, Liz
700			_94218 _aKeddell, Emily
830			_aFamilies, Relationships and Societies _98467
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1332/204674319X15536730156921 _yRead abstract
856			_uhttp://www.reimaginingsocialwork.nz/2019/06/disguised-compliance-revisited/ _yRead blogpost
942			_cARTICLE _2ddc