000			02096nab a22003617a 4500
999			_c6204 _d6204
005			20250625151507.0
008			190321s2019 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aGang, Daye _98253
245			_aA call for evaluation of restorative justice programs _cDaye Gang, Bebe Loff, Bronwyn Naylor and Maggie Kirkman
260			_bSage, _c2019
500			_aTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2019. Advance online publication, 13 March 2019
520			_aRestorative justice as a response to sexual violence continues to be subject to significant criticism. To assess the evidence, we sought to appraise and synthesize evaluations of restorative justice programs for sexual and family violence offences by conducting a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature. However, our rigorous search identified only one eligible study. This dearth of evidence leaves us unable to identify how best to achieve the aims for which programs were established and poses difficulties for policy makers determining whether it is justified to introduce restorative justice programs for sexual and family violence. We recommend that evaluations of restorative justice programs that accept sexual and family violence cases be conducted as a matter of urgency. (Authors' abstract). Record #6204
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252
650			_aINTERVENTION _9326
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aJUSTICE _9333
650			_aPERPETRATORS _92644
650			_aRESTORATIVE JUSTICE _9502
650		4	_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531
650		0	_aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS _93140
650		4	_aVICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9624
650		0	_aVICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE _96716
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
700			_aLoff, Bebe _98254
700			_aNaylor, Bronwyn _95726
700			_aKirkman, Maggie _98255
773	0		_tTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2019. Advance online publication, 13 March 2019
830			_aTrauma, Violence & Abuse _94623
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019833003 _yRead abstract
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE