000			02052nab a22003257a 4500
999			_c6123 _d6123
005			20250625151503.0
008			190110s2018 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aJury, Ang _91454
245			_aWorkers’ constructions of the “good” and “bad” advocate in a domestic violence agency _cAng Jury, Natalie Thorburn and Ruth Weatherall
260			_bTaylor & Francis, _c2018
500			_aHuman Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 2018, 42(3): 318 - 326
520			_aGrassroots activist organizations are heavily reliant on workers’ willingness and commitment to give of themselves. Organization expectations accordant with this are often embedded with organizational cultures and climates, which then tend to reinforce behaviors that threaten sustainable well-being. To find out how this might manifest in our own grassroots, domestic violence-focused agency, the authors surveyed 111 workers and interviewed 12. Pervasive cultural norms of selflessness and toughness led to a collective construction of what constitutes “good” advocates and “bad” advocates. The authors therefore focus their discussion on the paramountcy of promoting acceptance of emotionality beyond clients to the workforce itself. (Authors' abstract). Record #6123
610		0	_aNational Collective of Independent Women's Refuges _910092
650			_aADVOCACY _94258
650		0	_96521 _aMANAGEMENT
650			_aMENTAL HEALTH _9377
650			_aSTRESS MANAGEMENT _97275
650		4	_aSUPPORT SERVICES _9591
650		4	_aTRAUMA _9612
650			_aWOMEN'S REFUGES _9650
650			_aWORKPLACE _9652
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700			_aThorburn, Natalie _96032
700			_aWeatherall, Ruth _96915
773	0		_tHuman Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 2018, 42(3): 318 - 326
830			_aHuman Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance _98097
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2018.1457583 _yRead abstract
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE