000			02966nab a22003137a 4500
999			_c6031 _d6031
005			20250625151458.0
008			181024s2018 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aJamieson, Brittany _97938
245			_aExposure to interpersonal violence during pregnancy and Its association with women’s prenatal care utilization : _ba meta-analytic review _cBrittany Jamieson
260			_bSage, _c2018
500			_aTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2018, Advance online publication, 15 October 2018
520			_aInadequate prenatal care utilization has been proposed as a mechanism between exposure to violence during pregnancy and adverse maternal and fetal obstetric outcomes. Adequate prenatal care is important for identifying and treating obstetric complications as they arise and connecting pregnant women to supports and interventions as needed. There is some evidence that pregnant women experiencing relational violence may delay or never enter prenatal care, though this association has not been systematically or quantitatively synthesized. The present meta-analysis investigates the relationship between interpersonal violence during pregnancy and inadequate prenatal care utilization across two dimensions: (1) no prenatal care during gestation (k = 9) and (2) delayed entry into prenatal care (k = 25). Studies were identified via comprehensive search of 9 social science and health-related databases and relevant reference lists. Studies were included if (1) participants were human, (2) violence occurred in the context of an interpersonal relationship, (3) abuse occurred during pregnancy (including abuse within 12 months before the time of assessment during pregnancy), (4) the study was empirical, peer-reviewed, and included quantitative data, (5) prenatal care utilization data were available, (6) they were in English, and (7) they were not part of an intervention study. Results from random-effects models found that women abused during pregnancy were more likely to never enter care (odds ratio [OR] = 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.55, 4.42]) or to delay care (OR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.48, 2.23]). Sociodemographic, abuse-related, and methodological factors emerged as moderators. Practice, policy, and research implications are discussed. (Author's abstract). Record #6031
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650		5	_9221 _aEMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
650			_aFAMILY VIOLENCE _9252
650		5	_9290 _aHEALTH SERVICES
650			_aINTERVENTION _9326
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aPREGNANCY _9455
650			_aREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH _93274
650			_aSCREENING _93081
650		0	_aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS _93140
650			_aYOUNG WOMEN _9661
773	0		_tTrauma, Violence & Abuse, 2018, Advance online publication, 15 October 2018
830			_aTrauma, Violence & Abuse _94623
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018806511 _yRead abstract
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE