| 000 | 01536nab a22002537a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c6030 _d6030 |
||
| 005 | 20250625151458.0 | ||
| 008 | 181024s2018 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _aAFVC | ||
| 100 |
_aJohnson, Margaret E. _97936 |
||
| 245 |
_aFeminist Judgments & #MeToo _cMargaret E. Johnson |
||
| 260 |
_bUniversity of Baltimore, _c2018 |
||
| 500 | _aNotre Dame Law Review, 2018, 94(1): 51-54 | ||
| 520 | _aThe Feminist Judgments book series [US] and the #MeToo movement share the feminist method of narrative. Feminist Judgments is a scholarly project of rewriting judicial opinions using feminist legal theory. #MeToo is a narrative movement by people, primarily women, telling their stories of sexual harassment or assault. Both Feminist Judgments and #MeToo bring to the surface stories that have been silenced, untold, or overlooked. These narrative collections can and do effectuate genderjustice change by empowering people, changing perspectives, opening up new learning, and affecting future legal and nonlegal outcomes. (Author's opening paragraph). "Feminist judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand" (#5893) was published in 2017. Record #6030 | ||
| 650 |
_aFEMINISM _9256 |
||
| 650 |
_aJUSTICE _9333 |
||
| 650 |
_aSEXUAL HARASSMENT _9534 |
||
| 650 | 4 |
_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531 |
|
| 650 |
_aSOCIAL MEDIA _93663 |
||
| 651 | 4 |
_aUNITED STATES _92646 |
|
| 773 | 0 | _tNotre Dame Law Review, 2018, 94(1): 51-54 | |
| 830 |
_aNotre Dame Law Review _97937 |
||
| 856 | _uhttps://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac/1072 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cARTICLE |
||