000 03591nab a22006737a 4500
999 _c5902
_d5902
005 20250625151452.0
008 180714s2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aYon, Youngje
_97675
245 _aElder abuse prevalence in community settings :
_ba systematic review and meta-analysis
_cYongje Yon, Christopher R. Mikton, Zachary D Gassoumis and Kathleen H. Wilber
260 _bThe Lancet,
_c2017
500 _aThe Lancet, 2017, 5(2), e147–e156
520 _bFor this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors searched 14 databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE, using a comprehensive search strategy to identify elder abuse prevalence studies in the community published from inception to June 26, 2015. Studies reporting estimates of past-year abuse prevalence in adults aged 60 years or older were included in the analyses. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to explore heterogeneity, with study quality assessed with the risk of bias tool. Findings: Of the 38,544 studies initially identified, 52 were eligible for inclusion. These studies were geographically diverse (28 countries). The pooled prevalence rate for overall elder abuse was 15·7% (95% CI 12·8–19·3). The pooled prevalence estimate was 11·6% (8·1–16·3) for psychological abuse, 6·8% (5·0–9·2) for financial abuse, 4·2% (2·1–8·1) for neglect, 2·6% (1·6–4·4) for physical abuse, and 0·9% (0·6–1·4) for sexual abuse. Meta-analysis of studies that included overall abuse revealed heterogeneity. Significant associations were found between overall prevalence estimates and sample size, income classification, and method of data collection, but not with gender. (From the authors' abstract). Prevalence data comes from studies from 28 countries, including Canada, China, Ireland, Hong Kong, Mexico, United Kingdom and United States, but not Australia or New Zealand. Record #5902
650 4 _aSEXUAL VIOLENCE
_9531
650 _aELDER ABUSE
_9220
650 _aFINANCIAL ABUSE
_92968
650 _aNEGLECT
_9401
650 _aOLDER PEOPLE
_9414
650 _aPHYSICAL ABUSE
_9439
650 4 _aPSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE
_9472
650 _aPREVALENCE
_9457
650 0 _aSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
_93140
651 _aBRAZIL
_93774
651 4 _aCANADA
_92602
651 _aCHINA
_93612
651 _aCOLOMBIA
_97685
651 _aCROATIA
_93776
651 _aEGYPT
_97679
651 _aGERMANY
_95137
651 _aGREECE
_95217
651 _aHONG KONG
_96383
651 _aINDIA
_92649
651 _aIRAN
_96146
651 _aIRELAND
_93457
651 _aISRAEL
_93637
651 _aITALY
_95218
651 _aJAPAN
_94000
651 _aLITHUANIA
_97680
651 _aMACEDONIA
_97681
651 _aMALAYSIA
_97682
651 _aMEXICO
_93778
651 _aTHE NETHERLANDS
_95203
651 _aPERU
_97683
651 _aPORTUGAL
_97214
651 _aSPAIN
_94448
651 _aSWEDEN
_92700
651 _aTHAILAND
_97684
651 _aTURKEY
_97215
651 4 _aUNITED KINGDOM
_92604
651 4 _aUNITED STATES
_92646
700 _91713
_aMikton, Christopher
700 _aGassoumis, Zachary D.
_97676
700 _aWilber, Kathleen H.
_97677
773 _tThe Lancet, 2017, 5(2), e147–e156
830 _aThe Lancet
_94435
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30006-2
_zDOI: 1016/S2214-109X(17)30006-2 (Open access)
856 _uhttp://www.who.int/news-room/detail/14-06-2017-abuse-of-older-people-on-the-rise-1-in-6-affected
_yRead WHO summary
942 _2ddc
_cARTICLE