000 04421nam a22004577a 4500
999 _c5671
_d5671
005 20250625151441.0
008 171115s2017 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAFVC
100 _aGilchrist, Tania
_97165
245 _aĀwhinatia tāu Whānau: Kua Wehea ai, Kua Ngaro ai :
_bMāori experiences of reconnecting and rebuilding relationships with kin-based systems of whānau, hapū and iwi
_cTania Gilchrist
246 _aA thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Psychology, University of Auckland
260 _c2017
300 _aelectronic document (191 pages) ; PDF file
500 _aThesis (Doctor of Clinical Psychology), University of Auckland.
520 _aMeaningful connection is an important contributor to individual wellness and resilience. As an Indigenous people, Māori are often considered whānau orientated and shaped by a broad kin-based network of relationships with whānau, hapū and iwi. However, a number of Māori are not able to connect with these potential systems of support. The aim of this research was to explore the issues surrounding whānau, hapū and iwi disconnection and the way that individuals and whānau rebuild and reconnect following a period of disconnection. Utilising a Kaupapa Māori methodology and Whakapapa Framework, fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who had experienced disconnection and subsequently begun a process of reconnection with whānau, hapū and iwi. Thematic analysis explored common patterns across all interviews and identified that the causes of disconnection are complex with historical, contemporary, and cross generational factors present. The experience of disconnection itself reflected alienation and longing for whakapapa characteristic of ngākau mamae, a loss of culture and relationships. Nevertheless, a number of enduring threads of connection were present in the form of wairuatanga, whakapapa kōrero and whenua. Thus the reconnection process was identified as a dynamic and complex interaction of simultaneous disconnection and connection in areas that strengthen and weaken at various stages of life. An active point of turning toward reconnection was identified. This then paved the way for further connection with whānau, hapū and iwi. Dealing with difficult dynamics was identified as a challenging aspect of the reconnection process. However, an acceptance of such realities and contradictions facilitated alternative pathways to reconnect and alongside the re-establishment of whānau tikanga facilitated safe interaction. Overall, the experience of reconnection was identified by participants as transformative and valuable. Reconnection to whānau, hapū and iwi facilitated an increase in self-reported wellbeing, and a sense of tūrangawaewae or a place to stand within whānau, hapū and iwi and Māori identity in general. This study highlighted that whakapapa remains important to a number of Māori, and that creating connection within clinical practice supports Māori to articulate their experience and be supported in their identity as Māori. An increased awareness of the dynamics of disconnection and reconnection processes will likely facilitate a more robust cultural formulation, and consequently more culturally responsive intervention within psychological treatment for Māori, who present with issues that may involve a sense of disconnection from whānau, hapū and iwi. (Author's abstract). Record #5671
650 _9252
_aFAMILY VIOLENCE
650 _95382
_aTŪKINOTANGA Ā-WHĀNAU
650 _aCOLONISATION
_95710
650 _aFAMILIES
_9238
650 0 _94515
_aHEALING
650 _aHISTORICAL TRAUMA
_95295
650 5 _9321
_aINTERGENERATIONAL VIOLENCE
650 5 _9325
_aINTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
650 _aMĀORI
_9357
650 _aMENTAL HEALTH
_9377
650 _aPSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS
_9473
650 _aTHESES
_9606
650 _aHAPŪ
_97166
650 _aHAUORA HINENGARO
_95549
650 _aIWI
_9331
650 _aPĀMAMAE HEKE IHO
_96928
650 _aRANGAHAU MĀORI
_95532
650 _aRONGOĀ
_96759
650 _aTAIPŪWHENUATANGA
_95548
650 0 _aTIKANGA TUKU IHO
_95542
650 _aTUHINGA WHAKAPAE
_95598
650 _aWHĀNAU
_9642
650 _aWHANAUNGATANGA
_9643
856 _u http://hdl.handle.net/2292/33566
942 _2ddc
_cTHESIS