000			03712nab a22003017a 4500
650			_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE
999			_c5655 _d5655
005			20250625151441.0
008			171031s2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aGranqvist, Pehr _97133
245			_aDisorganized attachment in infancy : _ba review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers _cPehr Granqvist, L. Alan Sroufe, Mary Dozier, Erik Hesse, Miriam Steele, Marinus van Ijzendoorn, Judith Solomon, Carlo Schuengel, Pasco Fearon, Marian Bakermans-Kranenburg, Howard Steele, Jude Cassidy, Elizabeth Carlson, Sheri Madigan, Deborah Jacobvitz, Sarah Foster, Kazuko Behrens, Anne Rifkin-Graboi, Naomi Gribneau, Gottfried Spangler, Mary J Ward, Mary True, Susan Spieker, Sophie Reijman, Samantha Reisz, Anne Tharner, Frances Nkara, Ruth Goldwyn, June Sroufe, David Pederson, Deanne Pederson, Robert Weigand, Daniel Siegel, Nino Dazzi, Kristin Bernard, Peter Fonagy, Everett Waters, Sheree Toth, Dante Cicchetti, Charles H Zeanah, Karlen Lyons-Ruth, Mary Main & Robbie Duschinsky
260			_bTaylor & Francis, _c2017
500			_aAttachment & Human Development, 2017, 19(6): 534-558
520			_aDisorganized/Disoriented (D) attachment has seen widespread interest from policy makers, practitioners, and clinicians in recent years. However, some of this interest seems to have been based on some false assumptions that (1) attachment measures can be used as definitive assessments of the individual in forensic/child protection settings and that disorganized attachment (2) reliably indicates child maltreatment, (3) is a strong predictor of pathology, and (4) represents a fixed or static “trait” of the child, impervious to development or help. This paper summarizes the evidence showing that these four assumptions are false and misleading. The paper reviews what is known about disorganized infant attachment and clarifies the implications of the classification for clinical and welfare practice with children. In particular, the difference between disorganized attachment and attachment disorder is examined, and a strong case is made for the value of attachment theory for supportive work with families and for the development and evaluation of evidence-based caregiving interventions. KEYWORDS: Disorganized attachment, infancy, attachment-based interventions, maltreatment, attachment disorder This review paper represents a broadly held consensus concerning what we currently understand about disorganized infant attachment and its implications across clinical and child welfare practices. Our hope is that this review will prove to be useful both in supporting best practice and in highlighting the gaps that occasionally surround the concept of attachment disorganization, particularly between basic theory and research on the one hand and their applications in clinical and child welfare practice on the other. (Authors' abstract). A summary of this article written by Robbie Duschinsky can be found on the Research in Practice blog. Record #5655
650			_aATTACHMENT _969
650			_aCHILD PROTECTION _9118
650		5	_9562 _aSOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
700			_aSroufe, L. Alan _97134
700			_aDozier, Mary _97135
700			_aHesse, Erik _97136
700			_aSteele, Miriam _97137
700			_aDuschinsky, Robbie _97138
773	0		_tAttachment & Human Development, 2017, 19(6): 534-558
830			_aAttachment & Human Development _97139
856			_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2017.1354040 _yRead abstract
856			_uhttps://www.rip.org.uk/news-and-views/blog/using-the-disorganised-attachment-classification-in-child-protection/ _ySummary
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE