| 000 | 02699nam a22003977a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 650 |
_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE |
||
| 650 |
_9121 _aCHILD SEXUAL ABUSE |
||
| 999 |
_c5653 _d5653 |
||
| 005 | 20250625151441.0 | ||
| 008 | 171026t2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _aAFVC | ||
| 100 |
_96983 _aHerbert, James L. |
||
| 245 |
_aNational comparison of cross-agency practice in investigating and responding to severe child abuse : _ba report to the NSW Ombudsman's Office (Report 1 of 2) _cJames Herbert and Leah Bromfield |
||
| 260 |
_aAdelaide, SA : _bAustralian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia, _c2017 |
||
| 300 | _aelectronic document (71 pages) ; PDF file: 1.52 MB | ||
| 520 | _aThis report summarises a comparison of Australian and select international jurisdictions against the approach of the Joint Investigation Response Team (JIRT) model in New South Wales. The structure of this report includes a brief rationale for the characteristics compared, a narrative summary of cross-agency responses in Australia, a narrative summary of selected cross-agency responses in equivalent international jurisdictions, and a detailed comparison of responses in Australian jurisdictions. This report reviewed a variety of international MDT models to better understand cross-agency practices in comparable jurisdictions. The included jurisdictions were judged to be comparable liberal democracies with similar social and economic conditions. The review included a brief narrative discussion of prominent international collaborative models. These include Child Advocacy Centres in the United States and Canada, Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (United Kingdom), Joint Child Abuse Investigation Teams (Scotland), Barnahus (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Greenland, & Iceland), and Puawaitahi (New Zealand). These are briefly compared to the JIRT model. (From the Executive summary). Record #5653 | ||
| 650 |
_aCHILD PROTECTION _9118 |
||
| 650 |
_aINTERAGENCY COLLABORATION _9396 |
||
| 650 |
_aINTERVENTION _9326 |
||
| 650 |
_aJUSTICE _9333 |
||
| 650 |
_aPOLICE _9444 |
||
| 650 | 5 |
_9445 _aPOLICE PROCEDURES |
|
| 651 | 4 |
_aAUSTRALIA _92597 |
|
| 651 | 4 |
_aCANADA _92602 |
|
| 651 |
_aDENMARK _93636 |
||
| 651 |
_aFINLAND _96374 |
||
| 651 |
_aGREENLAND _97130 |
||
| 651 |
_aICELAND _97131 |
||
| 651 | 4 |
_aNEW ZEALAND _92588 |
|
| 651 |
_aSCOTLAND _92635 |
||
| 651 |
_aSWEDEN _92700 |
||
| 651 | 4 |
_aUNITED KINGDOM _92604 |
|
| 651 | 4 |
_aUNITED STATES _92646 |
|
| 700 |
_aBromfield, Leah _9827 |
||
| 856 | _uhttp://www.unisa.edu.au/Global/EASS/Research/ACCP/National%20Comparison%20of%20Cross-Agency%20Practice%20in%20Investigating%20and%20Responding%20to%20Severe%20Child%20Abuse%20.pdf | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cREPORT |
||