000			03214nab a22003857a 4500
650			_9252 _aFAMILY VIOLENCE
650			_9300 _aHOUSING
999			_c5569 _d5569
005			20250625151437.0
008			170829t2017 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aJury, Ang _91454
245			_a"What's his is his and what's mine is his" : _cAng Jury, Natalie Thorburn and Ruth Weatherall _bfinancial power and the economic abuse of women in Aotearoa
260			_bAotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers, _c2017
500			_aAotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 2017, 29(2): 69-82 (Open access)
520			_a"INTRODUCTION: Economic abuse has the potential to have far-reaching consequences for victims, but is largely invisible within discourses on violence against women. While it is internationally recognised as a pervasive and highly gendered method for abusers to gain and maintain control over women, there is no research specifically on economic abuse in Aotearoa New Zealand. AIM: This study aimed to understand the experiences and effects of economic abuse for women in Aotearoa New Zealand, particularly in relation to methods of coercive control, with the intention of developing risk matrices to be used by practitioners. METHODS: We conducted a survey with 448 respondents—with 398 the focus of analysis for this article. The survey contained a combination of scaling and open-ended questions. This article reports findings of a qualitative analysis of aspects from responses to open-ended questions. FINDINGS: Abusers employed a range of abusive methods to restrict victims’ freedom and exercise domination. These abusive behaviours seemed to follow traditional hegemonic constructions of masculinity as synonymous with “provider” in that many of these methods relied on the reproduction of gendered stereotypes which subjugate women to a subordinate position in the household. Women experienced a range of adverse emotional impacts as a result of this abuse. CONCLUSIONS: We found that, in reality, abusers relied on these stereotypes to justify the appropriation of women’s resources and consequent removal of women’s financial autonomy while, paradoxically, the women described providing for the household on greatly restricted finances—whether through paid or unpaid labour. We have translated these findings into risk matrices to assist the identification of economic abuse.' (Authors' abstract). Record #5569
650			_aABUSED WOMEN _925
650			_aECONOMIC ABUSE _93432
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aEMPLOYMENT _9227
650			_aFINANCIAL ABUSE _92968
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650		0	_aLGBTQIA+ _93453
650			_aMĀORI _9357
650			_aPACIFIC PEOPLES _93408
650			_aPASIFIKA _9419
650			_aSURVEYS _9592
650		4	_aVICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9624
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700			_aThorburn, Natalie _96032
700			_aWeatherall, Ruth _96915
773	0		_tAotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 2017, 29(2): 69-82 (Open access)
830			_aAotearoa New Zealand Social Work _96152
856			_uhttps://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/312
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE