000			02152nab a22002657a 4500
650		4	_aSEXUAL VIOLENCE _9531
999			_c5476 _d5476
005			20250625151432.0
008			170621t2017 -nz||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aJülich, Shirley J. _93728
245			_aSexual violence and substantive equality : _bcan restorative justice deliver? _cShirley Jülich and Natalie Thorburn
260			_bSpringer, _c2017
500			_aJournal of Human Rights and Social Work, 2017, 2(1): 34–44
520			_a"The effects of sexual crimes upon victims and the wider community are pervasive and far-reaching, yet conventional attempts to address offending and seek justice for victims have not succeeded; rather, they have left victims without a sense of justice and often magnified the adverse impacts of the initial victimization. The applicability and appropriateness of restorative justice to such gendered categories of crime has been long debated, but emerging evidence suggests that it may offer victims greater satisfaction by way of recognition of the need for substantive over procedural equality, and consequent privileging of victims’ needs and experiences. This focus on substantive equality and its implications for justice also aligns with international covenants, which recognize the inadequacy of formal equality and traditional approaches to justice when addressing crimes where perpetration is dependent on the manifestation of power and control. The article therefore sets out the case for restorative justice in accordance with these imperatives for substantive equality, and discusses the challenges inherent in providing safe restorative practices." (Authors' abstract). Record #5476
650		5	_9303 _aABUSED WOMEN
650		5	_aHUMAN RIGHTS _9303
650		5	_aJUSTICE _9333
650		5	_aRESTORATIVE JUSTICE _9502
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
700			_96032 _aThorburn, Natalie
773	0		_tJournal of Human Rights and Social Work, 2017, 2(1): 34–44
830			_aJournal of Human Rights and Social Work _96771
856			_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41134-017-0029-0 _zRead abstract
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE