000			01898nab a22002777a 4500
650			_9103 _aCHILD ABUSE
999			_c5316 _d5316
005			20250625151425.0
008			170227t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aFeatherstone, Brid _96453
245			_aWhat has gender got to do with it? _bExploring physically abusive behaviour towards children _cBrid Featherstone
260			_bOxford University Press, _c1997
500			_aBritish Journal of Social Work, 1997, 27(3): 419-433
500			_aRecommended reading
520			_a"This article explores the lack of impact that feminism has had on analyses of physical abuse. It links this to the kinds of feminist theory which have been used to explore family violence generally. These have been based on fixed notions of men, women and children. It argues for perspectives which are characterized by an appreciation that gendered positions are neither fixed nor inevitable, but, rather, subject to constant struggle and redefinition. It argues that the concept of power may not be the most helpful concept to use when exploring emotional relationships which are characterized by vulnerability and dependency, and that the concept of domination may be more helpful. Finally, the paper draws on the work of Virginia Goldner and her associates to posit the possibility of working on a number of levels, from the psychological the material." (Author's abstract). Record #5316
650			_aRECOMMENDED READING _96431
650			_aFEMINISM _9256
650			_aGENDER _9269
650			_aWOMEN'S USE OF VIOLENCE _94412
651		4	_aUNITED KINGDOM _92604
773	0		_tBritish Journal of Social Work, 1997, 27(3): 419-433
830			_aBritish Journal of Social Work _95239
856			_uhttp://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/content/27/3/419.full.pdf
856			_uhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/23714747 _yRead abstract
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE