000			02021nab a22003137a 4500
999			_c5308 _d5308
005			20250625151424.0
008			170227t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAFVC
100			_aCrenshaw, Kimberle _96434
245			_aMapping the margins : _bintersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color
260			_bStanford University, _c1991
500			_aStanford Law Review, 1991, 43(6): 1241-1299
500			_aRecommended reading
520			_aThis article explores the race and gender dimensions of violence against women of colour. Contemporary feminist and antiracist discourses have failed to consider intersectional identities such as women of colour. Focusing on two dimensions of violence against women - battering and rape - the author considers how the experiences of women of colour are frequently the intersection of patterns of racism and sexism, and how these experiences tend not to be represented within the discourses of feminism or antiracism. Because of their intersectional identity as both women and of colour within discourses that are shaped to respond to one or the other, women of colour are marginalised within both. (From the abstract). This paper is also published in Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement / edited by Kimberlé Crenshaw, Neil T. Gotanda, Gary Peller & Kendall Thomas. The New Press, 1996. Record #5308
650			_aRECOMMENDED READING _96431
650			_aETHNICITY _9233
650			_aFEMINISM _9256
650			_aGENDER _9269
650			_aINTERSECTIONALITY _96433
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aRACISM _93087
650		0	_aVIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN _93088
651		4	_aUNITED STATES _92646
773	0		_tStanford Law Review, 1991, 43(6): 1241-1299
830			_aStanford Law Review _96496
856			_uhttp://blogs.law.columbia.edu/critique1313/files/2020/02/1229039.pdf
856			_uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039 _zStanform Law Review
942			_2ddc _cARTICLE