000			03169nam a22003857a 4500
650			_9252 _aFAMILY VIOLENCE
650			_9300 _aHOUSING
650			_9296 _aHOMELESSNESS
700			_9931 _aChung, Donna
999			_c5254 _d5254
005			20250625151422.0
008			161209s2016 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2204-8907 (online)
040			_aAFVC
100			_aBreckenridge, Jan _94142
245			_aNational mapping and meta-evaluation outlining key features of effective "safe at home" programs that enhance safety and prevent homelessness for women and their children who have experienced domestic and family violence : _bfinal report _cJan Breckenridge, Donna Chung, Angela Spinney & Carole Zufferey
260			_aSydney, NSW :: _bANROWS, _c2016
300			_aelectronic document (132 pages); PDF file: 8.57 MB
500			_aANROWS Horizons, Issue 01, May 2016
520			_aThis research project provided a national mapping and meta-evaluation of the key features of “safe at home” programs. “Safe at home” programs enhance safety and prevent homelessness for women and their children who have experienced domestic and family violence. The first stage, a state of knowledge paper (#4769), provided a comprehensive review of the literature and a national mapping of current “safe at home” programs by jurisdiction, including details of legislation underpinning “safe at home” programs in each jurisdiction. The second stage, the final research report, was a meta-evaluation of select evidence about Australian “safe at home” programs and practices. The meta-evaluation examined 20 evaluations of “safe at home” programs across Australia to identify the key features of effective programs and to provide recommendations for policy-makers, practitioners and researchers. The report found that “safe at home” programs had four common underlying themes, but each focused primarily on maximising women’s safety, using protection orders and ouster/exclusion provisions to reduce the risk of a perpetrator returning, or preventing homelessness, using case-management to assess risk, manage safety planning and consider women’s needs over time. Overall, one or more of the themes were identified across the “safe at home” evaluations, but the emphasis varied by program and at different points during the response provided. (From the website). Record #5254
650			_aDOMESTIC VIOLENCE _9203
650			_aEVALUATION _9236
650			_aINTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE _9431
650			_aPROGRAMME EVALUATION _9466
650		0	_aSafe@Home _94889
651		4	_aAUSTRALIA _92597
651		4	_aNEW ZEALAND _92588
651		4	_aUNITED KINGDOM _92604
700			_aSpinney, Angela _95081
700			_aZufferey, Carole _95082
773	0	3	_tANROWS Horizons, Issue 01, May 2016
830			_aANROWS Horizons _96302
856			_uhttp://anrows.org.au/publications/horizons/national-mapping-and-meta-evaluation-outlining-key-features-effective-safe-0
856			_zAccess the website _uhttp://www.anrows.org.au/publications/landscapes/national-mapping-and-meta-evaluation-outlining-key-features-effective-safe
942			_2ddc _cREPORT